Scenario 17-4.
Consider two cigarette companies, PM Inc. and Brown Inc. If neither company advertises, the two companies split the market and earn $50 million each. If they both advertise, they again split the market, but profits are lower by $10 million since each company must bear the cost of advertising. Yet if one company advertises while the other does not, the one that advertises attracts customers from the other. In this case, the company that advertises earns $60 million while the company that does not advertise earns only $30 million.
Refer to Scenario 17-4. What will these two companies do if they behave as individual profit maximizers?
a. |
Neither company will advertise. |
|
b. |
Both companies will advertise. |
|
c. |
One company will advertise, the other will not. |
|
d. |
There is no way of knowing without knowing how many customers are stolen through advertising. |
Correct option is b. Both companies will advertise.
Both the companies will advertise when they behave as individual profit maximizers. Since the companies are not following the collusion strategy & are behaving as individual profit maximizers, so both of them will advertise as a result of which the revenue of each company will decline by $10 million as they have to bear the cost of advertising. So, the total payoff in this case will be $80 million (2X$40). If they would have followed the collusion strategy then the total payoff would be $100 million (2X$50). So, by following the joint strategy both of the would have been able to maximize their profits. But since both of them are behaving as individual profit maximizers, therefore, both of them have to bear a $10 million decline in their revenue.
Scenario 17-4. Consider two cigarette companies, PM Inc. and Brown Inc. If neither company advertises,...
Consider the car industry, in which Ford and GM are the two dominant firms. (To keep the analysis simple, just forget about all the others.) The market size is $9 billion. Each firm can choose whether to advertise. Advertising costs $1 billion for each firm that chooses it. If one firm advertises and the other doesn't, then the former captures the whole market. If both firms advertise, they split the market 50:50 and pay for the advertising. If neither advertises,...
U5. Consider the cola industry, in which Coke and Pepsi are the two dominant firms. (To keep the analysis simple, just forget about all the others.) The market size is $8 billion. Each firm can choose whether to advertise. Ad- vertising costs $1 billion for each firm that chooses it. If one firm advertises and the other doesnt, then the former captures the whole market. If both firms advertise, they split the market 50:50 and pay for the advertising. If...
Scenario 17-2 Imagine that two oil companies, Big Petro Inc. and Gargantuan Gas, own adjacent oil fields. Under the fields is a common pool of oil worth $24 million. Drilling a well to recover oil costs $1 million per well. If each company drills one well, each will get half of the oil and earn a $11 million profit ($12 million in revenue minus $1 million in costs). Assume that having X percent of the total wells means that a...
Scenario 17-2 Imagine that two oil companies, Big Petro Inc. and Gargantuan Gas, own adjacent oil fields. Under the fields is a common pool of oil worth $24 million. Drilling a well to recover oil costs $1 million per well. If each company drills one well, each will get half of the oil and earn a $11 million profit ($12 million in revenue minus $1 million in costs). Assume that having X percent of the total wells means that a...
Exercise 13.3 Suppose that two mining companies, Australian Minerals Company (AMC) and South African Mines, Inc. (SAMI), control the only sources of a rare mineral used in making certain electronic components. The companies have agreed to form a cartel to set the (profit-maximizing) price of the mineral. Each company must decide whether to abide by the agreement (i.e., not offer secret price cuts to customers) or not abide (i.e., offer secret price cuts to customers). If both companies abide by...
The following payoff matrix depicts two companies, Lowe's and Home Depot, in an advertising game. The companies will be playing the same game several times. Each company makes its decision without knowing what the other chooses. The payoffs for each firm represent economic profits.Imagine that at the beginning of each week, Home Depot and Lowe's play the game described in the payoff matrix above. Assume there is no known end to the game, so Home Depot and Lowe's will effectively...
Consider the problem facing two firms in the fast-food restaurant market, Firm A and Firm B. Each company has just come up with an idea for a new fast-food menu item, which it would sell for $6. Assume that the marginal cost for each new menu item is a constant $2 and the only fixed cost is for advertising. Each company knows that if it spends $12 million on advertising, it will get 2 million consumers to try its new...
Netflix Case Analysis for the article “How Netflix sent the biggest media companies into a frenzy, and why Netflix thinks some are getting it wrong” by Alex Sherman, CNBC, Wed, 13 June 2018 Background/Problem Statement Netflix began in 1997 but did not cause a major disruption in the media business until later in its existence when it began its DVD order service, which many believe took out Blockbuster, and the like, and it's true big disruption when it began its...
On January 17, 2007, Apple, Inc. introduced the iPhone, which combines a mobile phone, an iPod, and Internet communications device. The phone’s Internet connection allows users to surf the Web over Wi-Fi, access e-mail, watch TV shows and videos, and use Google maps. A new interface allows the user to communicate by touching the screen with a finger. Another feature is that the screen will shift from portrait to landscape view when you simply rotate the device in your hand....
1. Why is growing the number of users such an important metric for social media companies? How does Metcalfe’s Law relate to the profitability of social media companies? 2. Most social media companies rely on ad revenue as their main source of income. What are other ways that LinkedIn generates income? Why is it important for a company to have multiple ways of generating income? 3.Why do recruiters and job seekers like LinkedIn? Explain why an employer may dislike LinkedIn....