how do externalities give rise to government intervention in the market?
Externalities are of two types-Negative and Positive which creates deadweight loss so the government intervenes in the market to correct the situation by imposing taxes or providing a subsidy.
In the negative externality, the third party bears the burden of the economic process such as pollution so that the quantity produced in the market will be greater than the socially efficient quantity and the price would be lower which will lead to an external cost which is borne by the third party. To correct this, the government will impose a tax on the polluter so that the quantity decreases and the price increases which will bring the output to its optimal level where Marginal social benefit = Marginal social cost.
In case of a positive externality, production of goods from an economic process results in positive benefits to the third party such as education which will result in an inefficient quantity as the goods produced will be lower than the socially optimal level. In this case, the government will intervene and provide a subsidy which will increase the production of good to its optimal level.where the marginal social benefit = marginal social cost
how do externalities give rise to government intervention in the market?
Describe how externalities, market failures, and taxes are related. Why government intervention is usually required to address the economic failure that results, and how taxes are used to fund this?
Externalities require government intervention when A. violence will result between disputing parties. B. there are only a few sellers in the market. C. property rights are not clearly established. D. the government imposes sales taxes. E. all of these answer options are correct.
According to a local politician, there is no need for government intervention when positive externalities are present because no one is being harmed. Comment about this opinion from an economic point of perspective. Use appropriate diagram(s) to illustrate and explain your answer.
All of the following are reasons for government intervention in a market-based system EXCEPT: 1) Provision of public goods O 2) Correction for externalities 3) Enforcement of regulations and antitrust laws 4) Redistribution of income 5) Improvement of managerial quality
• What are "market externalities," including "positive externalities" and "negative externalities? Give two examples of positive externalities and two of negative externalities. Discuss negative externalities in view of "The story of stuff" • What is "Karl Polanyi's Paradox" (not his brother "Michael Polanyi's Paradox")? Give an example. What is the "Malthusian" theory of population, and what is its underlying ideology? What are the general arguments against Malthusian theory? What is the concept of "the carrying capacity of the Earth"? What...
In regard to the free market and government intervention, explain the meaning of market failure and government failure
Describe a recent government intervention into a market. What was the perceived [or real] market failure that was occurring [or, on other words what was the rational behind the government stepping into a market]?
Consider the following situation after a government intervention. In this market, the quantity demanded is zero when the price is above 200 and quantity supplied is zero when the price is zero. Before the government intervention, the market equilibrium quantity and price were 100 and 10. After the government imposed a tax of $2 per unit, the price to consumers increased to $11 and only 90 units were a. Calculate the consumer surplus after the government intervention. b. Calculate the...
In a pure market economy, A. there is no role for government. B. government intervention might be needed. C. large markets where people meet to buy and sell are required. D. all of these answer options are correct.
1)Define and give an example of a common resource. Without government intervention, will people use this good too much or too little? Why? 2) Define and give an example of a public good. Is it likely that the private market provide this good on its own? Explain.