Question

can anyone paraphrase this for me Supplier evaluation and selection problem has been studied extensively. Various...

can anyone paraphrase this for me

Supplier evaluation and selection problem has been studied extensively. Various decision making approaches have been proposed to tackle the problem. In contemporary supply chain management, the performance of potential suppliers is evaluated against multiple criteria rather than considering a single factor-cost. This paper reviews the literature of the multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection. Related articles appearing in the international journals from 2000 to 2008 are gathered and analyzed so that the following three questions can be answered: (i) Which approaches were prevalently applied? (ii) Which evaluating criteria were paid more attention to? (iii) Is there any inadequacy of the approaches? Based on the inadequacy, if any, some improvements and possible future work are recommended. This research not only provides evidence that the multi-criteria decision making approaches are better than the traditional cost-based approach, but also aids the researchers and decision makers in applying the approaches effectively

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Supplier evaluation and selection problem have been contemplated broadly. Different basic leadership approaches have been proposed to handle the issue. In contemporary production network the board, the exhibition of potential providers is assessed against numerous criteria instead of considering a solitary factor-cost. This paper surveys the writing of the multi-criteria basic leadership approaches for provider assessment and choice. Related articles showing up in the worldwide diaries from 2000 to 2008 are accumulated and broke down with the goal that the accompanying three inquiries can be replied: (i) Which approaches were prevalently applied? (ii) Which evaluating criteria were paid more attention to? (iii) Is there any inadequacy of the approaches? In light of the insufficiency, assuming any, a few enhancements and conceivable future work are suggested. This examination not just gives proof that the multi-criteria basic leadership approaches are superior to anything the conventional cost-based methodology, yet in addition helps the analysts and chiefs in applying the methodologies viably

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
can anyone paraphrase this for me Supplier evaluation and selection problem has been studied extensively. Various...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Read the articles provided (Riggio, 2008) and Javidan & Walker (2012). Perform a self-assessm...

    Read the articles provided (Riggio, 2008) and Javidan & Walker (2012). Perform a self-assessment of the global mindset competencies. What competencies do you feel are your strengths? Your areas for improvement? What next learning steps could you take to address your areas for improvement? LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT: THE CURRENT STATE AND FUTURE EXPECTATIONS Ronald E. Riggio Claremont McKenna College This article discusses the common themes in this special issue of Consulting Psychology Journal on "Leadership Development" and summarizes some of the...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
Active Questions
ADVERTISEMENT