Question

Big companies have moved overseas to pay less taxes. Top corporate U.S. rates can reach 35%,...

Big companies have moved overseas to pay less taxes. Top corporate U.S. rates can reach 35%, while others are much lower, Ireland's rate is 12.5%. There are many stakeholders concerned about this issue; the U.S. government, corporate executives, the U.S. labor force (employees), corporate investors just to list a few.

Is it okay to move overseas to save tax dollars? Research the issue. Select a stakeholder and a position pro or con. Give a detailed defense of your position.

In the subject box, put your stakeholder and if you are for moving or against moving to save tax dollars. (For example: Foreign Country - For Moving)

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

(Foreign Country – For moving)

  1. Yes it is okay to move overseas to save tax dollars. Big companies in the US are moving to Ireland for lower tax rates i.e. 12.5% as compare to the US rates i.e. 35%. The companies are moving through the mode of taking over the companies that operating the Ireland. The big advantage is tax inversions besides lower tax rate. By acquiring the company in Ireland and using its cash flows for business transactions and also earning from the acquired company from the Ireland are also taxed at low rate.

For example if let say A co. is operating in the US and it is a big company in the US. The company has also foreign earning. In this case the A Co’s foreign income are taxed at high corporate tax. And if the Company move to the Ireland by acquiring another company in the Ireland of same business, then the company’s foreign earning are taxed at lower tax rate @ 12.5%. Tax saving amount will also go up.

Most countries have much lower tax rate and also some exemption for foreign earnings and in the US the disadvantage is of High tax rate for domestic as well as foreign earnings. So most of the big companies in the US are moving to overseas for high tax reason.

  1. Stakeholder – U.S. Government

To best of my knowledge the most disadvantage part to the U.S. government is loss of corporate tax revenue. In the long term the companies are reducing the investment in the U.S. due to this high tax rate. The big corporate of the U.S. that generates more tax revenues are leaving that is also the big disadvantage for the U.S government.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Big companies have moved overseas to pay less taxes. Top corporate U.S. rates can reach 35%,...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • What should have Merck & Co, Inc done differently in regards to river blindness? Merck &...

    What should have Merck & Co, Inc done differently in regards to river blindness? Merck & Company, Inc.: Having the Vision to Succeed by Stephanie Weiss and David Bollier An Expensive Care for a Poor Market In 1978, Dr. P. Roy Vagelos, then head of the Merck research labs, received a provocative memorandum from a senior researcher in parasitology, Dr. William C. Campbell. Dr. Campbell had made an intriguing observation while working with ivennectin, a new antiparasitic compound under investigation...

  • CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a...

    CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant "E" slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm...

  • Case: Enron: Questionable Accounting Leads to CollapseIntroductionOnce upon a time, there was a gleaming...

    Case: Enron: Questionable Accounting Leads to CollapseIntroductionOnce upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant “E,” slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm laid off 4,000...

  • 4. Perform a SWOT analysis for Fitbit. Based on your assessment of these, what are some strategic options for Fitbit go...

    4. Perform a SWOT analysis for Fitbit. Based on your assessment of these, what are some strategic options for Fitbit going forward? 5. Analyze the company’s financial performance. Do trends suggest that Fitbit’s strategy is working? 6.What recommendations would you make to Fitbit management to address the most important strategic issues facing the company? Fitbit, Inc., in 2017: Can Revive Its Strategy and It Reverse Mounting Losses? connect ROCHELLE R. BRUNSON Baylor University MARLENE M. REED Baylor University in the...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT