Brief Fact Summary. Two women brought lawsuits against West Virginia University Hospital, claiming they were injured as a result of negligent treatment received at the hospital. The trial court did not allow the women to present evidence to support their claims that the doctors who treated them appeared to be hospital employees, when they were actually independent contractors.
Synopsis of Rule of Law. A hospital may be found vicariously liable for the negligence a doctor working at the hospital is charged with, even when the doctor is working as an independent contractor.
Facts. In July 1998, Jaclyn Burless (Plaintiff) learned she was
pregnant. In November 1998, Plaintiff went to West Virginia
University Hospital (WVUH) for an ultrasound. Burless (Plaintiff)
signed a consent form at that time that stated the faculty
physicians and resident physicians in the hospital providing
treatment are not employees of the hospital. When Burless
(Plaintiff) delivered at WVUH in late February 1999, there were
complications and her daughter, Alexis Price, had seizures and
suffered a stroke. Burless (Plaintiff) claimed that the doctors and
the hospital were negligent by failing to monitor her labor and
delivery, and that the negligence caused her daughter severe and
permanent mental, neurological, and psychological injuries. Her
lawsuit said WVUH was vicariously liable based upon a theory of
apparent agency between WVUH and the doctors who provided the
alleged negligent care.
Melony Pritt"s (Plaintiff) case [consolidated by
the court for review purposes] arose from a visit to the emergency
department at WVUH in June 1998. At that time, Pritt (Plaintiff)
was diagnosed as nine weeks pregnant, and she had a cyst on her
left ovary. When Plaintiff returned later in her pregnancy to have
the cyst removed, she signed an informed consent for a laparotomy
and left ovarian cystectomy. The surgery was complicated when the
cyst ruptured because it had not been properly contained or treated
with antibiotics. Plaintiff was discharged on that date, but then
returned two days later with a massive infection in her abdomen
which resulted in the premature labor and delivery of her son.
Plaintiff claimed her son suffered severe and permanent mental,
neurological, and psychological injuries. Plaintiff then sued WVUH,
claiming that injuries to herself and her son were a result of
negligence by the doctors when they elected and performed an
elective laparoscopic cystectomy procedure.
Issue. May a hospital be found vicariously liable for the negligence a doctor working at the hospital is charged with, even when the doctor is working as an independent contractor?
Held. (Davis, J.) Yes. A hospital may be found vicariously liable for the negligence a doctor working at the hospital is charged with, even when he is working as an independent contractor. There is no evidence that the doctors actually worked for the hospital, and WVUH (Defendant) cannot therefore be found liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior, but it can be held liable under a theory of apparent agency. Under West Virginia Law, whether or not there are any contractual arrangements with independent contractors, a hospital is liable to the injured patient for acts of malpractice that occurred in its emergency room, so long as the required proximate cause and damages are present. That same rule should apply outside of the emergency room. The public"s confidence in the modern hospital"s portrayal of itself as a full service health care provider appears to be at the foundation of the national trend toward adopting a rule of apparent agency to find hospitals liable, in some circumstances, for the negligence of doctors providing services inside the hospital. Also, WVUH (Defendant) did not unequivocally inform Pritt (Plaintiff) and Burless (Plaintiff) that the physicians treating them were not employees of WVUH. The disclaimer language indicating that faculty doctors and resident doctors who provide treatment in the hospital are independent contractors was not enough to support WVUH"s (Defendant) request for a grant of summary judgment in their favor. Reversed.
Discussion. In accordance with the tests for respondeat
superior, evidence of control must be present in order to show that
a doctor is an employee of a hospital. Courts turn to apparent
agency tests in cases where there might be vicarious liability for
the negligence of independent contractors.
Read the above case. Do you agree with the court’s decision? Why would or would not the hospital be responsible for the actions of the physician (the doctrine of respondeat superior)? Answer the question with at least 300 words and include 2-3 APA references
Yes, I agree with the court's decision. When any hospital or health care provider projects themselves as an all-rounder health care organization catering to the different needs of different patients, the patients go for treatment because of the name of the hospital and their reputation and not because of the independent contracted doctors or physicians they hired. As such, they have a responsibility towards their patients for providing correct treatment and to be held liable in case of any damage due to negligence.
It is the responsibility of the hospital to maintain a strict policy of proper health treatment to be given at their institutions. People spend thousands of dollars in their health treatment and they expect the hospitals to give them proper care. in the case of the two ladies whose children suffered due to medical and labor complications, the hospital and the staff, whether contracted or independent, were directly responsible for the negligence. For their actions, the lives of four people suffered. Therefore, the court should and must hold them liable for their actions. When the hospitals rely on the goodwill earned by the very proper health treatment given by their physicians, they are equally responsible to bear the damages by the wrong treatment given by them or their negligent actions
This will not only deter other health institutions from repeating the same mistakes but it will also help in bringing about a change for the patient's safety. Therefore, it is correct to hold the hospitals liable for the actions of their physician, whether they are contracted by the hospital or independent.
Brief Fact Summary. Two women brought lawsuits against West Virginia University Hospital, claiming they were injured...