Johnson Ltd. determined that the net present value of an investment in technological
improvements at its plant in France would be €12,000,000 if pending litigation was resolved in
the company's favor and would be €3,000,000 if the courts ruled against the company. Johnson's
attorneys in France assessed the probability of a favorable ruling at 85%.
Required: What is the expected net present value of the project? Show your work
Solution:
Expected net present value = NPV if litigation resolved * Probability in company favor + NPV if litigation against company * Probability against company favor
= (12,000,000*85%) + (3,000,000*15%)
= 10,650,000 Euro
Johnson Ltd. determined that the net present value of an investment in technological improvements at...
Mastery Problem: Net Present Value and Internal Rate of Return Part One Companies use capital investment analysis to evaluate long-term investments. Capital investment evaluation methods that use present values are (1) Net present value method (NPV) and (2) Internal rate of return (IRR) method. Methods That Use Present Values Of the two capital investment evaluation methods, a defining characteristic NPV and IRR is that they consider the time value of money. This means that money tomorrow is worth less than money today....
JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (Dollars and Shares in Millions Except Per Share Amounts) (Note 1)* 2016 71,890 21,789 50.101 20,067 9.143 29 Sales to customers Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling, marketing and administrative expenses Research and development expense In-process research and development Interest income Interest expense, net of portion capitalized (Note 4) Other (income) expense, net Restructuring (Note 22) Eamings before provision for taxes on income Provision for taxes on income (Note 8)...
JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (Dollars and Shares in Millions Except Per Share Amounts) (Note 1)* 2016 71,890 21,789 50.101 20,067 9.143 29 Sales to customers Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling, marketing and administrative expenses Research and development expense In-process research and development Interest income Interest expense, net of portion capitalized (Note 4) Other (income) expense, net Restructuring (Note 22) Eamings before provision for taxes on income Provision for taxes on income (Note 8)...
JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (Dollars and Shares in Millions Except Per Share Amounts) (Note 1)* 2016 71,890 21,789 50.101 20,067 9.143 29 Sales to customers Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling, marketing and administrative expenses Research and development expense In-process research and development Interest income Interest expense, net of portion capitalized (Note 4) Other (income) expense, net Restructuring (Note 22) Eamings before provision for taxes on income Provision for taxes on income (Note 8)...
JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (Dollars and Shares in Millions Except Per Share Amounts) (Note 1)* 2016 71,890 21,789 50.101 20,067 9.143 29 Sales to customers Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling, marketing and administrative expenses Research and development expense In-process research and development Interest income Interest expense, net of portion capitalized (Note 4) Other (income) expense, net Restructuring (Note 22) Eamings before provision for taxes on income Provision for taxes on income (Note 8)...
JOHNSON & JOHNSON AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS (Dollars and Shares in Millions Except Per Share Amounts) (Note 1)* 2016 71,890 21,789 50.101 20,067 9.143 29 Sales to customers Cost of products sold Gross profit Selling, marketing and administrative expenses Research and development expense In-process research and development Interest income Interest expense, net of portion capitalized (Note 4) Other (income) expense, net Restructuring (Note 22) Eamings before provision for taxes on income Provision for taxes on income (Note 8)...
CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant "E" slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm...
Case: Enron: Questionable Accounting Leads to CollapseIntroductionOnce upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant “E,” slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm laid off 4,000...