Harley Davidson purchases components from three suppliers. Components purchased from Supplier A are priced at $ 5 each and used at the rate of 206700 units per year. Components purchased from Supplier B are priced at $ 4 each and are used at the rate of 25,000 units per year. Components purchased from Supplier C are priced at $ 5 each and used at the rate of 10,000 units per year. Currently Harley purchases a separate truckload from each supplier. As part of its JIT drive, Harley has decided to aggregate purchases from the three suppliers. The trucking company charges a fixed cost of $ 400 for the truck with an additional charge of $100 for each stop. Thus, if Harley asks for a pickup from only one supplier, the trucking company charges $ 500; from two suppliers it charges $ 600; and from three suppliers it charges $ 700. Harley incurs a holding cost of 20% (of the price) for each component. What is the minimal annual inventory cost of the new aggregate replenishment strategy ? What is the minimal annual inventory cost of the Harley’s current strategy of ordering separately from each supplier ? How much is the saving resulted ? PLEASE SHOW WORK
Supplier A |
Supplier B |
Supplier C |
DA = 206,700 |
DB = 25,000 |
DC = 10,000 |
S = 500 |
S = 500 |
S = 500 |
CA = 5 |
CB = 4 |
CC = 5 |
H = .2 |
H= .2 |
H = .2 |
Minimal annual inventory cost of new aggregate replenishment strategy:
S* = S + SA + SB + SC = 400 + 100 + 100 + 100 = 700
Optimal joint order frequency:
N* = SQRT((206700*0.2*5 + 25000*0.2*4 + 10000*0.2*5)/(2*700)) = 13
Order quantities corresponding to N*:
QA = DA/N* = 206700/13 = 15,900
QB = DB/N* = 25,000/13 = 1923.08
QC = DC/N* = 10,000/13 = 769.23
Holding and order cost:
A = (QA/2)hC = (15,900/2)*0.2*5 = 7950
B = (QB/2)hC = (1923.08/2)*0.2*4 = 769.23
C = (QC/2)hC = (769.23/2)*0.2*5 = 384.62
Total holding cost = 7950 + 769.23 + 384.62 = 9103.85
Total order cost = N*S* = 13*700 = 9,100
Total cost = total holding cost + total order cost = 9103.85+9100 = $18,203.85
Minimal annual inventory cost of current strategy:
Supplier A |
Supplier B |
Supplier C |
|
Demand per year |
206700 |
25,000 |
10,000 |
Fixed cost/order |
500 |
500 |
500 |
Optimal order size |
14,377 SQRT=((2*206700*500)/(0.2*5)) |
5590 SQRT=((2*25000*500)/(0.2*4)) |
3,162 SQRT=((2*10000*500)/(0.2*5) |
Order frequency |
14.38/year (206,700/14,377) |
4.47/year (25,000/5590) |
3.16/year (10,000/3,162) |
Annual cost |
14,377 (206,700/14377)500 + (14,377/2)(.2)(5) |
4,472 (25000/5590)500 + (5590/2)(.2)(4) |
3,162 (10000/3162)500 + (3162/2)(.2)(5) |
Total cost = 14,377 +4,472+ 3,162 = $22,011
Harley would save $22,011 - $18,203.85 = $3,807.15
Note : I took approximations in between, but the whole procedure is correct. Please go through everything.
Harley Davidson purchases components from three suppliers. Components purchased from Supplier A are priced at $...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company's needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 3 1 $12 $13 $14 2 $10 $11 $10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However, as long as...
Problem 9-11 (Algorithmic) Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company’s needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 3 1 $11 $12 $15 2 $11 $10 $11 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However,...
Problem 9-11 (Algorithmic) Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company’s needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 3 1 $11 $11 $13 2 $10 $12 $10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However,...
Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company's needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Component Supplier 1 2 $12 $13 $11 $12 3 $10 $10 Se 2 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However, as long as...
Problem 4-11 (Algorithmic) Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company's needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows Supplier Component $10 $14 $10 $12$12 $10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However, as long as Edwards provides sufficient...
Suppose you invest in 100 shares of Harley-Davidson at $60 per share and 300 shares of Yahoo at $25 per share. Over the next year, the price of Harley-Davidson increases to $90 and the price of Yahoo decreases to $15 per share. (a)What is your profit (in $) from the portfolio? $ (b)Using your answer in part (a), calculate the return on your portfolio (as a percent). % (c)What is the return on your investment in Harley-Davidson stock (as a...
Problem 4-11 (Algorithmic) Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company's needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows: Supplier Component 1 2 13 1 $12 $13 510 2 $11 $12 s10 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can supply. However,...
Benson Manufacturing is considering ordering electronic components from three different suppliers. The suppliers may differ in terms of quality in that the proportion or percentage of defective components may differ among the suppliers. To evaluate the proportion defective components for the suppliers, Benson has requested a sample shipment of 500 components from each supplier. The number of defective components and the number of good components found in each shipment is as follows. Supplier Component 10 35 Good 490 465 455...
A linear programming computer package is needed. Edwards Manufacturing Company purchases two component parts from three different suppliers. The suppliers have limited capacity, and no one supplier can meet all the company's needs. In addition, the suppliers charge different prices for the components. Component price data (in price per unit) are as follows. Supplier Component 2 1 $11 $12 $13 2 $9 $10 59 Each supplier has a limited capacity in terms of the total number of components it can...
A large manufacturer purchases an identical component from three independent suppliers that differ in unit price and quantity supplied. The relevant data for 2012 and 2014 are given here. Unit Price ($) Supplier Quantity (2012) 2012 2014 A 100 4.95 5.50 B 200 5.60 5.95 C 120 5.50 6.20 (a) Compute the price relatives for each of the component suppliers separately. Compare the price increases by the suppliers over the two-year period. (b) Compute an unweighted aggregate price index for...