Assigned Company:
The Kellogg Company (Kellogg's) is an American multinational food-manufacturing company headquartered in Battle Creek, Michigan, United States. Kellogg's produces cereal and convenience foods and markets its products under several well-known brand names including Corn Flakes, Keebler, and Cheez-It.
1.
a) Describe the recall situation in this example. (2 points)
b) Who are the stakeholders involved and what are their objectives? (3 points)
c) How was the information communicated to stakeholders? (2 points)
d) Could Kellogg’s have communicated the information to other stakeholders
more effectively? (3 points)
2.
a) Where were the contaminated cereal products produced? (2 points)
b) Where were they shipped? (2 points)
c) What are Kellogg’s shipping terms of sale? (2 points)
d) In what order sizes (e.g. conveyance) might the contaminated products have
been shipped to customers? (2 points)
e) If an Incoterm was used for any customer locations, what might it have been
and why? (2 points)
3.
a) Describe how Kellogg’s’ procurement team could have mitigated the risks
associated with outsourcing production to a contract manufacturer in this
situation. (3 points)
b) Describe the ethical risks associated with contract manufacturing in this
situation. (3 points)
c) Based on the strategic importance of contract manufacturing, which Supplier
Interaction Model best describes the relationship that exists between Kellogg’s
and Kerry Inc. What should it be? Why? (4 points)
4.
Identify and explain the Processing Stages that Kellogg’s might have followed in
conducting the recall. (10 points)
5.
Kellogg’s use this recall as an example in conducting a self-assessment of its
ability to transition to a circular economy model. After completing the
assessment, they ask you to take a lead on this transformation project. (10
points)
List the project objectives
List the main activities
List the project milestones, such as required progress reports or the completion of major tasks
6.
a) Which mode of transport, conveyance, and equipment would Kellogg’s likely
have used to ship products to the countries involved in the recall of “Honey
Smacks” cereal? (5 points)
b) What legal considerations would Kellogg’s have to be aware of when selecting
carriers for domestic and international shipments of products involved in this
recall? (5 points)
7.
Consider the following scenario: Kellogg’s distribution of cereal products to
customers in Guatemala is coordinated through Crowley Maritime Corporation, a
U.S.-owned and operated third-party logistics company (3PL) with a distribution
centre in Guatemala City, Guatemala.
Orders for the Latin America region were consolidated, and aggregate orders
were placed with Kerry Inc. in Gridley, Il. Kerry Inc. shipped consolidated orders,
palletized and labelled by distributor, by intermodal to Mexico City, at which point
trailers with orders for distributors in countries south of Mexico were moved over
the road.
Crowley’s general manager in Guatemala City advised Kellogg’s head office
personnel in Battle Creek, Michigan that they had identified approximately 140
pallets of salmonella-contaminated cereal products still in wholesale inventory in
Guatemala.
Unfortunately, despite FDA recommendations for disposal, government officials
in Guatemala, upon learning of the recall through their government Facebook
account, had contacted Crowley and insisted that no contaminated food products
be disposed of in Guatemala. Furthermore, since the contaminated products had
been shipped from the United States, Guatemalan authorities insisted that the
contaminated products be returned to the U.S. for disposal.
Kellogg’s Supply Chain Manager had already spoken with their freight forwarder
and customs broker regarding arrangements to return the contaminated products
to the U.S. Mexican authorities would not allow the contaminated products to
transit through Mexico, which left marine transport as the only economically
viable option to ship the contaminated products from Guatemala to the U.S.
Kellogg’s customs broker had placed a call to US Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) for advice since the returning goods would be labelled “CONTAMINATED
– Not for Resale – Goods returned for disposal only”. Since the returning
shipment would not be subjected to the same level of scrutiny as a commercial
shipment, CBP expressed concerns that someone might target the shipment for
smuggling or terrorism reasons. As a result, CBP stated they would only allow
the shipment to enter the US if the origin port was compliant with the
International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS) and the Container
Security Initiative (CSI).
a)
Describe the possible intermodal transportation of Kellogg’s “Honey Smacks”
cereal from Kerry Inc. in Gridley, Il to food distributors in Guatemala.
For example:
i) What intermodal carrier(s) might be available to Kerry Inc. in Gridley, Il.
offering service to Mexico and Guatemala? (2 points)
ii) Assuming the intermodal shipment travelled by rail from Gridley to
Mexico City, describe the route and possible carriers involved. (1 point)
iii) Describe the highway route from Mexico City to Guatemala City. (1 point)
iv) Where would the shipment encounter Guatemalan Customs when it
left Mexico and entered Guatemala? (1 point)
b) Describe the cargo security issues surrounding the return shipment from
Guatemala to New York.
For example:
i) Which Port in Latin America is the most likely origin Port in this
scenario (i.e. that meets the cargo security requirements of CBP)? (2 points)
ii) Describe the journey (route and equipment) from Guatemala City to
the Port in Latin America. (3 points)
iii) Describe the journey (route and possible ocean carriers) from the
Port in Latin America to New York, and on-forwarding to Gridley, Il.
(5 points).
8.
Identify and describe the relevant cargo security programs that are involved in
the reverse logistics scenario described in question 7.
For example:
2
Supply Chain Management
SCMT-1280-001 Final Exam Project
i)
In which security programs would membership likely benefit Crowley,
Kellogg’s USA, and Kerry Inc.? Why? (5 points)
ii)
What would the Harmonized Code, and rate of duty, be when returning these
goods to the US? Provide the appropriate reference. (5 points)
1.
a) The recall situation was difficult as the brand had to recall
all of its products across the country because of the issues found
in the product.
b) The various stakeholders involved were: employees (production
people, operations people, logistics, etc.), employers (Board of
directors, CEO, manager of the brand and unit at default), share
holders (who had the bought shares of the brand) and consumers who
had been eating the product.
c) The stakeholders got to know about the entire scenario when it
went public in the country and the news channels had pointed
fingers to Kellogg's for their bad product delivery.
d) Yes, the stakeholders could have been communicated in advance
about the incident that had happened and they could have asked the
ways in which the situation could have been kept in control. PR
campaigns could have been decided in advance.
2.
a) The contaminated product was produced in the US.
b) They had been shipped across the country to various stores like
Walmart, Amazon stores, etc.
c) The shipping terms are that Kellogg's will have the entire right
to refuse, reject or accept any shipment at any point of time. ALl
the details about the products should be sent in advance.
d) The order sizes would have been different depending upon the
size of the box chosen. There are high chances of the material to
be present in any box.
e) FOB can be the incoterm used stating the port of shipment so
that the products can be traced back.
According to the guidelines of Chegg and shortage of time. I can answer only few parts
Assigned Company: The Kellogg Company (Kellogg's) is an American multinational food-manufacturing company headquartered in Battle Creek,...