Question

In the following table are the marginal abatement costs of two firms. Note that an entry...

In the following table are the marginal abatement costs of two firms. Note that an entry in the table indicates the cost of reducing emissions by one unit from the previous level. For example, $300 is the additional abatement cost for firm 1 to reduce its emissions from 3 tons to 2 tons, and $40 is the cost for firm 2 to reduce its emissions from 7 tons to 6 tons.

  1. Suppose that the Environmental Protection Agency wants to reduce aggregate emissions of the firms to 10 tons by requiring each firm to reduce its emissions to 5 tons. Explain why this will not be a cost-effective way to reduce aggregate emissions to 10 tons?
  2. How much would you allow each firm to emit if you wanted to reduce aggregate emissions to 10 tons cost-effectively?

    Firm Emissions

    Firm 1

    Firm 2

    10

    $0

    $0

    9

    $40

    $10

    8

    $80

    $20

    7

    $120

    $30

    6

    $160

    $40

    5

    $200

    $50

    4

    $240

    $60

    3

    $260

    $70

    2

    $300

    $80

    1

    $340

    $90

    0

    $380

    $100

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
In the following table are the marginal abatement costs of two firms. Note that an entry...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • he following table contains information on the marginal abatement costs of four firms, related to the quantity of emissi...

    he following table contains information on the marginal abatement costs of four firms, related to the quantity of emissions. Currently, Firm 1 emits 40 tons/week, Firm 2 emits 35 tons/week, Firm 3 emits 30 tons/week, and Firm 4 emits 25 tons/week. Thus, total emissions are 130 tons/week. Suppose the government wishes to reduce total emissions to 60 tons/week. Emissions 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 MAC Firm 1 ($/ton) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7...

  • Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1=12 -...

    Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1=12 - 2E1 MAC2 =10 - E2 Assume the marginal external damages from emissions are: M E D = 1/2 E A . where EA is the sum of the two firms’ emissions. What quantity of emissions do firms produce in the absence of government intervention? What are the total external damages? What are the total abatement costs? Derive the aggregate marginal abatement cost function (Hint:...

  • Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1 =12−2E1MAC2...

    Consider two firms (i.e., firms 1 & 2) with heterogeneous marginal abatement cost functions: MAC1 =12−2E1MAC2 =10−E2. Assume the marginal external damages from emissions are: M E D = 12 E A . where EA is the sum of the two firms’ emissions. What quantity of emissions do firms produce in the absence of government intervention? What are the total external damages? What are the total abatement costs? Derive the aggregate marginal abatement cost function (Hint: This will be a...

  • Two thermic power plants have the following marginal and total cost of abatement of nitrogen oxide...

    Two thermic power plants have the following marginal and total cost of abatement of nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions. When faced with no restrictions each of them emits maximum 100 ppm (parts per million) of NOx. Firm 1: MAC1=5 A1 TAC1=2.5 (A1)^2 Firm 2: MAC2 = 10 A2 TAC2= 5(A2)^2 (8 pts) The EPA finds the total NOx emissions of 200 ppm too much and seeks for improvement in air quality by specifying the reduction of 40% in total emissions from...

  • 5. Suppose that there is an industry with two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement...

    5. Suppose that there is an industry with two firms (1 and 2) with marginal abatement cost curves as follows MAC1 1,000 2E1 MAC2 500 E2 E1 and E2 represent the respective emissions of each firm in tonnes [3] (a) Solve for initial emissions for each fim and rewrite both of the MAC equations as functions of abatement [6] (b) Derive the Industry MAC curve for this industry . Briefly explain each of the steps you take to find the...

  • A firm’s marginal abatement cost function is given by MAC = 200–5E. Costs are in dollars...

    A firm’s marginal abatement cost function is given by MAC = 200–5E. Costs are in dollars per tonne and emissions are in tonnes per year. The firm is given 20 tradeable pollution permits (each permit allows it to emit one tonne of pollution) and the current market price per permit is $100. Suppose that, after adopting new abatement technology, the firms marginal abatement function becomes MAC = 160–4E a)Given no change in the permit price how many tonnes of pollution...

  • 13. The marginal benefit of being able to emit a ton of sulfur dioxide emissions for...

    13. The marginal benefit of being able to emit a ton of sulfur dioxide emissions for two firms are given by: MBx 200 (Ex /2) MBy-300-(Ey3) Note that these marginal benefit figures can be interpreted as marginal cost of abating emission down to levels Ex and Ey Government regulators want to reduce total sulfur dioxide emissions to a total of 1000 tons If the government imposes the same standard of 500 tons maximum emissions on both firms what would be...

  • 2. The table shows the emissions of two sources and the marginal abatement costs (MCC, 1,000/week)...

    2. The table shows the emissions of two sources and the marginal abatement costs (MCC, 1,000/week) Emissions 12 1 10987654320 tons/week MCC. Source! | Ο | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4|ST 8 10T 14T 24|38|70 MCC: Source0 2 4 6 10 14 20 25 31 38 5894 160 Suppose that initially each source is emitting at the uncontrolled level (12 tons a week) so total emissions are 24 tons. Now assume that we want to reduce overall emissions...

  • Marginal Units of Pesticide Runoff Abated Marginal Benefit of Abatement Marginal Cost of Abatement Farm A...

    Marginal Units of Pesticide Runoff Abated Marginal Benefit of Abatement Marginal Cost of Abatement Farm A Cost of Abatement Farm B %20 $21 $23 $27 $31 %35 $38 $40 $45 $%55 $30 %90 $80 $75 $60 50 $40 $37 %35 %15 %10 $34 $37 $40 $45 $50 $55 $57 $%59 $65 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 uestion 14 The government proposes an emissions standard mandate for all farms to (uniformly) reduce pesticide runoff by 40% (Assume Farm...

  • Efficiency through Emissions Taxes Consider two firms that emit a uniformly mixed air pollutant (e.g., carbon...

    Efficiency through Emissions Taxes Consider two firms that emit a uniformly mixed air pollutant (e.g., carbon dioxide). The marginal abatement cost functions for Firm 1 and Firm 2 are (subscripts indicate firms): MAC1 =  100 - 2e1 MAC2 = 100 - 0.50e2 Aggregate emissions for the industry are denoted as E = e1 + e2. The marginal damage function is: MD = 0.40E [1] Write out the aggregate marginal abatement cost (AMAC) function for the industry. Hint: solve the MAC curves...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT