Is there any room for violent action in religion? When might it be acceptable to commit an act of violence? What event in history might support your view?
Violence can be described as an act carried out by using physical strength to inflict injury, hurt or slay someone. Violence is an illegal act and is punishable. It has a deep-rooted connection in destitution, unemployment, racial discrimination, lack of literacy, domestic violence and abuse, disturbed childhood due to lack of parental guidance and love and fanaticism. Violence is not unavoidable. Religions were brought into existence for the purpose of making human beings ethical and also to bring peace and harmony in the society. But the irony is that these religions resort to take the support of violence to make people follow them.
Religion can be described as an ideology which advocates the belief in divinity and the followers of a particular religion have to adhere to the set of beliefs, practices, rites and rituals and customs preached by it. No original or sacred texts of any religions preach the use of violence. On the contrary, all religions extol peace, harmony, liberty and to lead a pious, moral, spiritual and humble life. Violence is unacceptable and not endorsed by any religion.
But, religious violence is not a new concept. It is an act of violence mainly conducted due to intolerance about other religions and is carried out against the places of worship and people of different religious faith. History is rife with many instances of violent struggles in the name of religion. Religious violence is still prevalent on a large scale and is emerging as the main reason for violence in the world. Our world is progressing with many technological advancements and awareness among people, but this development does not have any effect on the reduction of violence perpetrated on religious grounds. Some people are religious fanatics who misinterpret their religious doctrines and unleash a series of violent and destructive acts against others. These people do not have any remorse in killing and harming several innocent lives. They justify their abominable acts by citing their distorted version of religious convictions. There is no place for violent action in any religion, which is genuinely formed to preach the teachings of God.
It is undesirable to accept violence as a means to achieve some gains. But sometimes, certain situations put a person or group of people in a situation where violence seems the only way. For example, a person encounters a shooter, who is on a shooting spree and killing people. This person is hidden from the view of the shooter and possesses a weapon, then shooting the terrorist seems to be a plausible action. Even though it is a violent act, killing or harming a person in self-defense or the defense of innocent people is not considered as violence, if there is absolutely no other way to contain the violence. The violent acts by the terrorists should not be tolerated and are to be dealt with seriously, as these terrorists lack any remorse, guilt and conscience and kill people to fuel their selfish motives. Such acts of terrorism warrant the use of violence in curbing and wiping out terrorism which is destroying the world peace.
The barbaric terrorist act carried out on September 11, 2001 was an example of violence inflicted on America by the coward terrorists, who killed thousands of innocent lives. This incident influenced the American government to fortify their security measures and carry out a full-fledged attack against the terrorists. American forces battered the terrorists who took refuge in Afghanistan and Iraq. There are many instances in our world history where wars against terrorists and enemies of mankind are fought. Many of these terrorists are incited by their religious heads, who brain-wash the terrorist to lash out against people of different faiths. Neither money nor any other materialistic things are the motivation for these terrorists, but these terrorists are so insanely obsessed with their religious dogmas that they create havoc in the lives of peace-loving citizens. No form of cajoling or milder threats seem to convert the terrorists minds to stop their dastardly acts. In such cases, use of violence seems to be the only answer to stop these radicals from perpetrating violence.
Is there any room for violent action in religion? When might it be acceptable to commit...
please pick any religion,What does it say about world religions and geography? when should it promote peace and unity, why does it promote conflict. You may want to use reference if you would like.
please pick any religion,What does it say about world religions and geography? when should it promote peace and unity, why does it promote conflict. You may want to use reference if you would like.
1. List some ways that you see religion having social control in the everyday world. 2. What are some sacred items that you're familiar with? Are there some objects, such as cups, candles, or clothing, that would be considered profane in normal settings but are considered sacred in special circumstances or when used in specific ways? 3 . Consider a religion that you are familiar with, and discuss some of its beliefs, behaviors, and norms. Discuss how these meet social...
A critical introduction into the study of religion. Explain why Martin treats religion as a social construct—both the category ‘religion’ and the stuff it denotes—using Kessler’s discussion of the Dao and Anselm as examples. How Society Works: Essentialism Animism and Essentialism According to some of the theories of primitive savages and primitive religion discussed briefly in Chapter 1, religion originated when ancient peoples attempted to understand and explain mysterious forces whose causes were beyond their primitive" understanding. What causes thunder?...
Alcohol consumption is never encouraged in healthcare, However, there are some exceptional instances when it might be recommended, can you name any instance? Support your answer.
Alcohol consumption is never encouraged in healthcare, However, there are some exceptional instances when it might be recommended, can you name any instance? Support your answer.
Peter is a 52-year-old patient that presented to the emergency room with chest pain. He was shoveling snow when he became short of breath and dizzy. He experienced chest pain that he described as “heavy” and “crushing”. The pain radiated to his jaw and back. After the symptoms began, he stopped working, went into his house and rested. The pain did not subside after 15 minutes so he decided to seek care. He is very anxious and shares that his...
385 Inappropriate Touching in the Operating Room Dale Buchbinder anesthesia for a patient undergoing ankle surgery. The patient is doe and her vital signs are good. You look up and see that the podiatric (foot) sengon is at the wrong end of the table and appears to be fondling the breas You are giving of the patient. You can't believe your eyes and ask, "What are you doing?" The surgeon stops touching the patient and looks up with a surprised...
its true or false questions 1. A computer security risk is any event or action that could cause a loss of or damage to computer hardware, software, data, information, or processing capability 2. A cybercrime is an online or Internet-based illegal act 3. Information transmitted over networks has a higher degree of security risk than information kept on an organization's premises 4. Users can take several precautions to protect their home and work computers and mobile devices from these malicious...
Hi, Please help me out with- The just-war theory considers a war acceptable when it satisfies several stringent criteria: The war must be fought for a just cause, the motives must be good, it must follow a call from a legitimate authority, and the use of force must be based on necessity (as a last resort).26 Central to notions of a just war are the principles of noncombatant immunity and proportionality. Noncombatants are those who will not be actively participating...