Show that L = {anbmanbm | n,m belongs to N} is Turing-recognisable, by precisely describing a Turing machine M with L(M) = L.
Let's go though it using an example aabbbaabbb
STAGE 1
STAGE 2
Show that L = {anbmanbm | n,m belongs to N} is Turing-recognisable, by precisely describing a...
Help me answer this question plz! 4. Let L = { (A) M is a Turing machine that accepts more than one string } a) Define the notions of Turing-recognisable language and undecidable language. b) Is L Turing-recognisable? Justify your answer with an informal argument. c) Justify with a formal proof your answer to b) d) Prove that L is undecidable. (Hint: use Rice's theorem.) e) Modify your answer to b) when instead of L you have the language Ln...
2. Let L-M M): M is a Turing machine that accepts at least two binary strings. a) Define the notions of a recognisable language and an undecidable language. [5 marks [5 marks] b) Is L Turing-recognisable? Justify your answer with an informal argument. c) Prove that L is undecidable. (Hint: use Rice's theorem.) [20 marks] 20 marks] d) Bonus: Justify with a formal proof your answer to b). 2. Let L-M M): M is a Turing machine that accepts at...
2. Let L = {hMi: M is a Turing machine that accepts at least two binary strings}. a) Define the notions of a recognisable language and an undecidable language. [5 marks] b) Is L Turing-recognisable? Justify your answer with an informal argument. [5 marks] c) Prove that L is undecidable. (Hint: use Rice’s theorem.) [20 marks] d) Bonus: Justify with a formal proof your answer to b). [20 marks] 2. Let L-M M): M is a Turing machine that accepts...
Subject : Theory of Computation Please answer , posting second time now cause nobody answered it previously Problem 3: Turing Machine Models Turing-Recognisablity and Decidability [20] a. Show that an FA with a FIFO queue is Turing universal (i.e equivalent in computational power to a Turing machine). You should regard this machine as being formally defined in a way that is very similar to a PDA, except that on each transition, instead of pushing and/or popping a character, the machine...
Let Show that L is undecidable L = {〈M) IM is a Turing Machine that accepts w whenever it accepts L = {〈M) IM is a Turing Machine that accepts w whenever it accepts
Design a DPDA M as a two-tape turing machine such that L(M) = {anbn : n>=0}
Let L = {0^n 1^n | n ≥ 0}. Draw the state diagram of a Turing machine deciding L= Σ∗\L(basically the complement of L), where Σ = {0,1}, and Γ = {0,1,#,U}, and “\” is set subtraction. I understand that the complement of L will be {0^n 1^m | n=!m} U {(0 U 1)* 1 0 {0 U 1)*}. How should I draw the state diagram with this? Let L = {0"1" | n > 0}. Draw the state diagram...
3. Let L= {MM is a Turing machine and L(M) is empty), where L(M) is the language accepted by M. Prove L is undecidable by finding a reduction from Arm to it, where Arm={<M,w>| M is a Turing machine and M accepts w}
Use a Turing Reduction to show that the following language is undecidable. L={ | L(M) is infinite}.
please answer and I will rate! 3. Let L = {M M is a Turing machine and L(M) is empty), where L(M) is the language accepted by M. Prove Lis undecidable by finding a reduction from Arm to it, where Ayv-<<MwM is a Turing machine and M accepts w). Answer: