Regression Analysis: Rating versus Shelf position
Method
Categorical predictor coding (1, 0)
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Regression 2 1511 755.6 5.50 0.013
Shelf position 2 1511 755.6 5.50 0.013
Error 20 2748 137.4
Total 22 4259
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
11.7222 35.48% 29.03% 21.34%
Coefficients
Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF
Constant 32.85 4.43 7.41 0.000
Shelf position
bottom 7.40 7.35 1.01 0.326 1.30
top 18.15 5.58 3.26 0.004 1.30
Regression Equation
Rating = 32.85 + 7.40 Shelf position_bottom + 0.0 Shelf
position_middle
+ 18.15 Shelf position_top
Using the results from the coefficients table from Minitab, which shelf’s rating is significantly
different from the middle shelf? Explain your decision, including test statistic and p-value
Regression Analysis: Rating versus Shelf position Method Categorical predictor coding (1, 0) Analysis of Variance Source...
Model B is below. Answer 8 -10 questions please. We were unable to transcribe this imageC. Regression Analysis: Avg. Tot. Score versus PPS, %Takers, T/S Ratio Model Summary SR-sg R-sq (adi) R-sq (pred) 78. 63% 32.5133 Coefficients Term Constant 1035.5 PPS %Takers T/S Ratio -2.03 Coef T-Value P-Value VIF 50.3 4.45 20.58 0.000 11.01 -2.849 0.215 13.22g.0001 54 2.21 -0.92 TRUE or FALSE: This model (C) has a higher Multiple R-squared than Model B. Briefly explainyour answer 8. 9. TRUE...