Question

In the Exxon Valdez case, the Supreme Court limited punitive damages in maritime cases to no...

In the Exxon Valdez case, the Supreme Court limited punitive damages in maritime cases to no more than the compensatory damages awarded in the same case. In cases that do not involve maritime law, the ratio is usually 9-to-1. Which is the better guideline? Why?

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

In the Exxon Valdez case, it was mentioned by Supreme Court that “punitive damages or exemplary damages” granted to the victims of Exxon Valdez oil spill (as mentioned in 5-3 decision). The amount was reduced from $2.5 billion dollar to the $500 million dollar. The overseas policy was undermine while considering the punitive damages. It was streamlined that these damages should be lesser than what was paid by Exxon Valdez in order to re-compensate the economical losses. A 1-1 ratio among compensatory and exemplary damages (mostly in maritime cases) is the good upper limit when irresponsibility is shown rather greater liability in case of intentional conduct. The 9-1 ration may offer better outcomes.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
In the Exxon Valdez case, the Supreme Court limited punitive damages in maritime cases to no...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • How does the Supreme Court decide which cases to hear? How do they decide each case?...

    How does the Supreme Court decide which cases to hear? How do they decide each case? Name and describe at least four steps.

  • The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the...

    The differences & similarities between the federal & state court systems. 2. The structure of the Washington state court system; i.e. the trial court of general jurisdiction, the intermediate appellate court, the state supreme court. 3. Remember, Washington is in the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. 4. Under both the Washington state and federal court system, there is one appeal as of right. Appeals to the Washington Supreme Court(in the state system), or to the U.S. Supreme Court in...

  • 1.Criminal and civil court cases are different. Consider these two business cases. (i) Civil- In the...

    1.Criminal and civil court cases are different. Consider these two business cases. (i) Civil- In the Liebeck v. McDonald’s case, a woman sued McDonald’s for serving hot coffee. The woman spilled hot coffee on her lap while trying to add cream and sugar. The woman sued McDonald’s for negligence, in a civil suit. The issue centered on whether or not the coffee’s specific temperature was unreasonably hot. McDonald’s lost the lawsuit. The compensatory verdict was $160,000. McDonald’s was found liable....

  • Case Brief: "Synder vs Phelps" using the IRAC method 150 words required CHAPTER 2 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW...

    Case Brief: "Synder vs Phelps" using the IRAC method 150 words required CHAPTER 2 CONSTITUTIONAL LAW Fox Box AND E-COMMERCE 31 CASE 2.3 U.S. SUPREME COURT CASE Free Speech Snyder v. Phelps 131 S.Ct. 1207, 179 LEd.2d 172. Web 2011 U.S. Lexis 1903 (2011) Supreme Court of the United States "Speech is powerful. It can stir pople to action, move Amendment protected Westboro's speech and reversed the them to tears of both joy and sorrow, and as it did judgment,...

  • Assignment 4-1 Week One Multiple Choice & Short Answer Total 40 points BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Comedian/actress Rosie...

    Assignment 4-1 Week One Multiple Choice & Short Answer Total 40 points BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Comedian/actress Rosie O’Donnell was part of a breach of contract trial with Gruner & Jahr over the “Rosie” magazine. O’Donnell’s contract stated that she would hold the position of editorial director of the magazine, with control over the editorial process and editorial staff, subject only to the veto of the CEO of G&J. During trial, O’Donnell told the court that in the first run of the...

  • Please read the following study case "Hot Coffee" then answer: In a world of get-rich-quick schemes,...

    Please read the following study case "Hot Coffee" then answer: In a world of get-rich-quick schemes, few are mentioned more frequently than lawsuits. One of the reasons is the infamous McDonald’s coffee case (Liebeck v. McDonald’s Restaurants). This is what happened in 1992 in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Stella Liebeck, seventy-nine, was riding in a car driven by her grandson. They stopped at a McDonald’s drive-through, where she purchased a Styrofoam cup of coffee. Wanting to add cream and sugar, she...

  • Chapter 6 Assignment Fill in the Blanks is the same 1. A malpractice. thing as a...

    Chapter 6 Assignment Fill in the Blanks is the same 1. A malpractice. thing as a civil wrong of negligence and refers to the responsibility established by the physician-patient 2. relationship. is the failure to perform a necessary action. 3. is the improper performance of an otherwise proper 4. or lawful act. meaning "the thing speaks for itself," applies 5. The doctrine of to the law of negligence. 6. The is responsible for explaining the risks of a treatment or...

  • 2.        Early English courts a.        relied exclusively on Norman Law. b.        included courts of law and...

    2.        Early English courts a.        relied exclusively on Norman Law. b.        included courts of law and equity. c.         heard cases that only applied to the nobility. d.        were often subject to bribery. 4.        A legal precedent a.        is no longer valid 50 years after the case is decided. b.        is no longer valid 100 years after the case is decided. c.         cannot be overruled. d.        remains valid unless and until overruled by a later case or statute. 5.        Judicial...

  • Business Law questions: 1. For many years, the Supreme Court believed that “commercial speech” was entitled...

    Business Law questions: 1. For many years, the Supreme Court believed that “commercial speech” was entitled to less protection than other forms of speech. One defining element of commercial speech is that its dominant theme is to propose a commercial transaction. This kind of speech is protected by the First Amendment, but the government is permitted to regulate it more closely than other forms of speech. However, the government must make reasonable distinctions, must narrowly tailor the rules restricting commercial...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT