Question

One of the most important Title VII civil rights cases is McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,...

One of the most important Title VII civil rights cases is McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973).  This case basically established what the burden of proof must be in order for someone to prove discrimination. Like most lawsuits, this case started out with a disgruntled employee, Percy Green. Mr. Green claimed that his employer, McDonnel-Douglas, had discriminated against him based on his race. This assignment will take you through the long legal history of this case. Don’t worry about mastering the details of the case. Our main goal here is to see how a civil rights case goes through the courts and to identify the courts that heard the case as it wound through the system.

First, Mr. Green sued McDonnell-Douglas because he got fired and they refused to re-hire him. He claimed racial discrimination. You will find this case by doing an on-line search using the case citation where that original lawsuit was reported: Green v. McDonell-Douglas Corporation, 318 F. Supp. 846 (E.D. Mo. 1970).Just type that citation into your search engine and you should find a number or results reporting the case. Answer these questions:

  1. Who is the plaintiff in this case?
  2. Who is the defendant?
  3. What Volume Number is the case reported in? What page number? What year?
  4. Is the court's decision the result of a trial or an appeal?

This case isn't long, so read through it. You'll see that among other things, the trial court found that McDonnell-Douglas did not discriminate against Green. Mr. Green wasn't happy with that decision, so he appealed it. Find this appeals case on-line using whatever search engine you desire: Green v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation, 463 F. 2nd 337 (8th Cir. 1970) and answer the following questions.

  1. Who is the Appellant?
  2. Who is the Appellee?
  3. What Volume Number is the case reported in? What page number? What year?
  4. Is the court's decision the result of a trial or an appeal?
  5. Did the court uphold the trial court's opinion, or reverse it? (While reading the whole case might be interesting, you can answer all these questions by looking at the first few paragraphs).

McDonnell-Douglas wasn't happy with the appeals court ruling, and appealed it to the US Supreme Court. You can find this case reported at: McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973).  Answer these questions:

  1. Who is the Petitioner?
  2. Who is the Respondent?
  3. What Volume Number is the case reported in? What page number? What year?
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

1.
The plaintiff, in this case, was Mr. Percy Green.
The defendant was McDonnel Douglas Corp.
318 Volume of Federal Supplement, beginning on page no. 846, in the years of 1970.
The court decision is the result of a trial.


2.
The appellant, in this case, was Mr. Percy Green.
The appellee was McDonnel Douglas Corp.
463 volume of federal reporter 2nd edition beginning on page 337 in the year of 1970.
The court decision is the result of the appeal.
The court reverses the opinion of the trial court.

3.
The petitioner in the case was McDonnell-Douglas
The respondent was Mr. Green.
411 volume number, 792 pages, in the year of 1973.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
One of the most important Title VII civil rights cases is McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green,...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • you must use the format provided below in order to brief the attached case 221 N.W.2d...

    you must use the format provided below in order to brief the attached case 221 N.W.2d 609 (1974) John SALSBURY, Appellee, v. NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant. No. 55960. Supreme Court of Iowa. September 18, 1974. Laird, Burington, Bovard & Heiny, Mason City, and William F. McFarlin, Des Moines, for appellant. Boyd G. Hayes, Charles City, and William Pappas, Mason City, for appellee. Considered en banc. HARRIS, Justice. This is the third appeal in which we have considered a claim...

  • Local 28, Sheet Metal Workers v. EEOC 478 U.S. 421 (1986) The union and its apprenticeship...

    Local 28, Sheet Metal Workers v. EEOC 478 U.S. 421 (1986) The union and its apprenticeship committee were found guilty of discrimination against Hispanics and African-Americans and were ordered to remedy the violations. They were found numerous times to be in contempt of the court’s order, and after 18 years the court eventually imposed fines and an affirmative action plan as a remedy. The plan included benefits to persons not members of the union. The Supreme Court held the remedies...

  • n the Ohio case Biddle v. Warren General Hospital, a number of patients brought a lawsuit...

    n the Ohio case Biddle v. Warren General Hospital, a number of patients brought a lawsuit against Warren General Hospital and a law firm, alleging the hospital unlawfully disclosed patients’ confidential medical information so that the law firm could search for potential Supplemental Security Income (SSI) eligibility for the payment of the patients’ unpaid medical bills. The Supreme Court of Ohio, through the opinion of Justice Resnick, held that (1.) an independent tort exists for the unauthorized, unprivileged disclosure to...

  • BUSINESS LAW Please analyze the case "Bozzio v. EMI Group, Ltd." shown below. Write a personal...

    BUSINESS LAW Please analyze the case "Bozzio v. EMI Group, Ltd." shown below. Write a personal analysis and discussion on case that includes the following: brief intro and relate case to life, explain issue, provide ruling, and elaborate on analysis. Below is an example of response structure as well. Downey v. Bob's Discount Furniture Holdings, Inc._Case in Point 3.4 Text Page 63 by Student 1 - Sunday, August 31, 7:26 AM This case intrigued me because it raised the question...

  • Case Study Analysis: Fred Stern & Company, Inc. (Knapp): In the business world of the Roaring...

    Case Study Analysis: Fred Stern & Company, Inc. (Knapp): In the business world of the Roaring Twenties, the schemes and scams of flimflam artists and confidence men were legendary. The absence of a strong regulatory system at the federal level to police the securities markets—the Securities and Exchange Commission was not established until 1934—aided, if not encouraged, financial frauds of all types. In all likelihood, the majority of individuals involved in business during the 1920s were scrupulously honest. Nevertheless, the...

  • A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge...

    A. Issues [1] In addition to damages for one year's notice period, can a trial judge award significant damages for the mere fact of an employee's dismissal, or for the stigma that that dismissal brings? Or for the employer thereafter competing with the ex-employee for the clients, before the ex-employee has got a new job? B. Basic Facts [2] This is an appeal from 2009 ABQB 591 (CanLII), 473 A.R. 254. [3] Usually a judgment recites facts before law. But...

  • Read the following case: Answer the questions accordingly: PLEASE MAKE COPY PASTE AVAILABLE EEOC v. Management...

    Read the following case: Answer the questions accordingly: PLEASE MAKE COPY PASTE AVAILABLE EEOC v. Management Hospitality of Racine 666 F.3d 422 (7th Cir. 2012) OPINION BY DISTRICT JUDGE YOUNG: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") brought this action on behalf of two serv- ers, Katrina Shisler and Michelle Powell, who were em- ployed at an International House of Pancakes franchise in Racine, Wisconsin (the "Racine IHOP"), alleging that the servers were sexually harassed in violation of Title VII of...

  • CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a...

    CASE 20 Enron: Not Accounting for the Future* INTRODUCTION Once upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant "E" slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm...

  • Case: Enron: Questionable Accounting Leads to CollapseIntroductionOnce upon a time, there was a gleaming...

    Case: Enron: Questionable Accounting Leads to CollapseIntroductionOnce upon a time, there was a gleaming office tower in Houston, Texas. In front of that gleaming tower was a giant “E,” slowly revolving, flashing in the hot Texas sun. But in 2001, the Enron Corporation, which once ranked among the top Fortune 500 companies, would collapse under a mountain of debt that had been concealed through a complex scheme of off-balance-sheet partnerships. Forced to declare bankruptcy, the energy firm laid off 4,000...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT