The Class Action Fairness Act of 205 imposed reforms to
limit forum shopping |
||
require certain lawsuits to be heard in state, and not federal court |
||
simplify the process of getting judicial approval of class action settlements. |
||
none of the above |
In the question of a property owner's responsibility toward persons who come onto his or her property,
the highest degree of care is owed to a licensee |
||
some courts have eliminated the distinction among trespasser, licensee, and invitee. |
||
all jurisdictions consider a social guest to be an invitee |
||
common law makes the obligation of the property owner toward trespassers and licensees the same as to invitees. |
The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 imposed reforms to limit forum shopping
Therefore correct answer is option: limit forum shopping
The Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 advocates federal scrutiny for the assessment of class action settlements. It does not simplify the process of getting judicial approval of class action settlements. This act has reduces the forum-shopping by petitioners in friendly state courts as it has extended federal diversity jurisdiction to class actions.
In the question of a property owner's responsibility toward persons who come onto his or her property, the highest degree of care is owed to a licensee
Therefore correct answer is option: the highest degree of care is owed to a licensee
The highest degree of care is owed to a licensee or owner because it owner’s responsibility to ensure and take utmost care of common areas by keeping them safe so that nobody can get harmed.
The Class Action Fairness Act of 205 imposed reforms to limit forum shopping require certain lawsuits...