Question

Can someone give Peer review on my blog text, thanks.

Robots are coming, are you ready!

Are you afraid of robotic mass unemployment? this issue has been on the lips of the labor market in recent years. An estimated 7% of existing jobs in Finland can be replaced by automation over the next 20 years, so the proliferation of robots will not lead to mass unemployment. Robots come with productivity gains as current production is achieved with less workload.

Over time, robotization generates completely new jobs, which at this stage may be difficult to imagine. Over time, the content of almost all professions changes, robots will liberate humans in so-called. routine work, but for the time being it is difficult for robots to displace e.g. problem-solving tasks.

Over the coming decades, robots will be stepping up in the workplace. This results in each of us having to / get rid of some of the day-to-day tasks that are going to make a new machine.

Predictions suggest that the wider proliferation of automation and robotization will have a greater impact than the proliferation of the Internet in recent decades. There is even talk of the second era of machines, which equates the upcoming revolution with the changes in production, working life and society brought about by the industrial revolution that began three hundred years ago. We are moving towards a new kind of division of labor between people and machines that will take people away from work, change people's current job roles and also create new jobs. From a social point of view, it is crucial that robotization is expected to improve work productivity, which means that ultimately our new colleagues create wealth. Therefore, it is not wise to slow down the development of technology, but it is most sensible to look for ways in which individuals and the labor market as a whole can adapt smoothly to the robot era.

The development of robots has raised concerns about the future of human work. At its worst, people fear that it will happen to horses a hundred years ago: the introduction of an internal combustion engine in cars and tractors made horses unnecessary as a means of transport and work, and nowadays horses are mainly used for hobbies. Can the proliferation of robots lead to permanent mass unemployment? Do the vast majority of people go into inactivity, and are only a few of us able to support ourselves through our work?

Because robots are more productive than humans, they can replace and replace, complement and support human work. It is likely that robots will soon be able to perform some of today's human tasks and perhaps some of their occupations. Robotization therefore does not lead to massive unemployment, as robots are more capable of replacing individual jobs than entire occupations involving multiple jobs. In addition, researchers underline that estimates of jobs at risk do not directly predict expected technological unemployment, as the take-up of new technologies is slow and difficult to predict due to a variety of economic, regulatory and social factors. With the introduction of new technologies, workers can adapt and find new jobs, thus preventing unemployment.

Technological development is also creating more work and completely new jobs. Technological development would lead to mass unemployment if it would cut more jobs than create them. We know from history that technological development has created more jobs than destroyed them. A well-functioning labor market can meet the challenge of automation. Even if 7% of current jobs are at risk, the number is not particularly high in comparison with the annual loss of around 12% of business jobs in our country. There are up to 500 jobs lost and created daily. This power is caused by the fact that new businesses are being created and old ones are being killed, while others are growing and others are reducing their workforce. The number of jobs created is the same or even slightly more than they are being destroyed. This is because there are two sides to the same process: technological development and innovation create and destroy jobs, but they do not destroy jobs. Workers are moving into new jobs, new businesses and new industries as technologies and innovations rebuild the economy. The creation and destruction of jobs is part of the process of re-focusing the resources of the economy to the most productive uses. This ongoing process of creative destruction is a major factor behind economic growth.

However, we are still far from having robots play a significant role in everyday life and in the workplace. This is because creating robots is very difficult. They work well in predetermined situations and in very regular environments. The benefits of new technologies will be reflected in new policies, products and services. Such innovations using new technologies are often random and extremely difficult to anticipate. When community services were created over a dozen years ago, few could imagine creating jobs for social media experts. In the US, up to 70% of the tasks that software developers did in 2000 did not exist at all in 1990.In the robotics era, valuable skills are those that the machine does not know well, but whose utilization is supported by information technology. Creating a robot that can recognize different situations, act in the right way and navigate a changing environment is still difficult. It is difficult to coordinate all the technologies needed for this. As far as Finland is concerned, it would be worthwhile to clarify which actions stimulate re-employment and direct investment in them. For example, we do not have information on the impact of active labor market policies and adult education on the transition to new jobs. Of the skills that will enter the job market in the robot era, the most important are those that the machine cannot do, such as creative problem solving and communication skills. As information technology helps us answer more and more questions, good questions become valuable. Such skills should be mainstreamed in the curriculum from primary school onwards.

Answer 1

lets rope in the well established fact that people are very comfortable with doing the montonous jobs.But inducing new technology into the market inevitably creates the new jobs replacing the older ones. Labour with mediocre education may or maynot adapt into developing new skills which prompts them to grapple with unemployment and poverty for a considerable amount of time. Higher productivity and new technology can be a welcome move but it is imperative that labour training has given the highest preference and skewing them from the unemployment