Project A:
Initial cost = 500,000
Salvage value at the end of the year 20: 500,000 – (20*1000)
= 500,000 – 20,000
= 480,000
Net Revenue: 70,00
Interest: 6%
Time Period: 20 years
Computation of NPV and annualized worth
Year | cash flow | Present value factor | Present value of cash flow | |||||
0 | -500000 | 1 | -500000 | |||||
1 to 20 | 7000 | 11.47 | 80290 | |||||
20 | 480000 | 0.312 | 149760 | |||||
Net Present Value | 269950 | |||||||
Present value annuity factor | 11.47 | |||||||
Annualised worth | 23535.31 |
Therefore,, the annualised worth of project A is 23535.31.
Project B:
Initial cost = 200,000
Salvage value at the end of the year 10: 0
Net Revenue: 630000
Interest: 6%
Time Period: 10 years
Computation of NPV and annualized worth
Year | cash flow | Present value factor | Present value of cash flow | |||||
0 | -200000 | 1 | -200000 | |||||
1 to 10 | 630000 | 7.36 | 46,36,800 | |||||
10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||
Net Present Value | 4436800 | |||||||
Present value annuity factor | 7.36 | |||||||
Annualised worth | 602826.1 |
Therefore the annualised worth of project b is 602826.1.
By comparing the annualised worth of project A and B, we find that the Project B is better than Project A. Hence, project B should be choosen.
E accepted Two projects with different planning horizons are difficult to compare. On technique i...
(a) Assuming an infinite planning horizon, which project is a
better choice at MARR = 12%\
The present worth for project B1 is $ thousand
The present worth for project B2 is $ thousand
(b) With a 10 year planning horizon, which project is a better
choice at MARR = 12%
Consider the two mutually exclusive projects in the table below. Salvage values represent the net proceeds (after tax) from disposal of the assets if they are sold at the...
Consider the two mutually exclusive projects in the table below. Salvage values represent the net proceeds (after tax) from disposal of the assets if they are sold at the end of each year. Both projects B1 and B2 will be available (or can be repeated) with the same costs and salvage values for an indefinite period. B Click the icon to view the additional data about the mutually exclusive projects. Click the icon to view the interest factors for discrete...
Consider the two mutually exclusive projects in the table below. Salvage values represent the net proceeds (after tax) from disposal of the assets if they are sold at the end of each year. Both projects B1 and B2 will be available (or can be repeated) with the same costs and salvage values for an indefinite period. Click the icon to view the additional data about the mutually exclusive projects. Click the icon to view the interest factors for discrete compounding...
Hearne Company has a number of potential capital investments. Because these projects vary in nature, initial investment, and time horizon, management is finding it difficult to compare them. Assume straight line depreciation method is used. Project 1: Retooling Manufacturing Facility This project would require an initial investment of $5,100,000. It would generate $910,000 in additional net cash flow each year. The new machinery has a useful life of eight years and a salvage value of $1,060,000. Project 2: Purchase Patent...
Can someone help me with part b? I can not seem to find the
correct answer for present worth of B1 with 10 year planning
horizon or the present worth of B2 with 10 year planning
horizon.
Consider the two mutually exclusive projects in the table below. Salvage values represent the net proceeds (after tax) from disposal of the assets if they are sold at the end of each year. Both projects B1 and B2 will be available (or can...
Hearne Company has a number of potential capital investments.
Because these projects vary in nature, initial investment, and time
horizon, management is finding it difficult to compare them. Assume
straight line depreciation method is used.
Project 1: Retooling Manufacturing Facility
This project would require an initial investment of $5,750,000. It
would generate $1,027,000 in additional net cash flow each year.
The new machinery has a useful life of eight years and a salvage
value of $1,216,000.
Project 2: Purchase Patent...
Hearne Company has a number of potential capital investments. Because these projects vary in nature, initial investment, and time horizon, management is find ing it difficult to compare them. Assume straight line depreciation method is used Project 1: Retooling Manufacturing Facility This project would require an initial investment of $5,750,000. It would generate $1,027,000 in additional net cash flow each year. The new machinery has a useful life of eight years and a salvage value of $1,216,000. Project 2: Purchase...
Hearne Company has a number of potential capital investments.
Because these projects vary in nature, initial investment, and time
horizon, management is finding it difficult to compare them. Assume
straight line depreciation method is used.
Project 1: Retooling Manufacturing Facility
This project would require an initial investment of $5,500,000. It
would generate $982,000 in additional net cash flow each year. The
new machinery has a useful life of eight years and a salvage value
of $1,156,000.
Project 2: Purchase Patent...
Assume a mutually exclusive scenario. Compare three alternatives on the basis of their capitalized cost (CC) at i=10% per year, which is the best alternative in this scenario? • Alternative 1, AW = $87,500 and n = (forever) • Alternative 2, PW = -$895,000 and n = (forever) • Alternative 3, First cost (FC) of $900,000, annual operating savings of 3,000 per year, salvage = $200,000, and n = (forever) Alternative 2 Alternative 3 None of them Alternative 1 QUESTION...
PA11-3 Comparing, Prioritizing Multiple Projects [LO 11-1, 11-2, 11-3, 11-6] Hearne Company has a number of potential capital investments. Because these projects vary in nature, initial investment, and time horizon, management is finding it difficult to compare them. Assume straight line depreciation method is used. Project 1: Retooling Manufacturing Facility This project would require an initial investment of $4,900,000. It would generate $874,000 in additional net cash flow each year. The new machinery has a useful life of eight years...