For any regular language L, there exists an integer n, such that
for all x ∈ L with |x| ≥ n, there exists u, v, w ∈ Σ∗, such that x
= uvw, and
(1) |uv| ≤ n
(2) |v| ≥ 1
(3) for all i ≥ 0: uviw ∈ L
In simple terms, this means that if a string v is ‘pumped’, i.e.,
if v is inserted any number of times, the resultant string still
remains in L.
Let us assume that u = anbk, v = ap, w = an-p
Clearly,
|uv| ≤ n and |v| ≥ 1
Now, uviw = anbkaipan-p = anbkan+(i-1)p
Clearly, for larger i, we cannot guarantee that k >= n+(i-1)p
Therefore, L is not regular.
In the class, we have shown that L {a"bn·n > 0} is not regular. Use the pumping lemma to show tha...
Can someone use pumping Lemma to show if these are regular languages or not c) Is L regular? give a finite automaton or prove using pumping lemma. (d) Is L context-free? give a context-free grammar or pushdown automaton, otherwise pr using pumping lemma. (16 pts)Given the set PRIMES (aP | p is prime (a) Prove that PRIMES is not regular. (b) Prove that PRIMES is not context-free. (c) Show if complement of PRIMES (PRIMES ) is regular or not. d)...
6.[15 points] Recall the pumping lemma for regular languages: Theorem: For every regular language L, there exists a pumping length p such that, if s€Lwith s 2 p, then we can write s xyz with (i) xy'z E L for each i 2 0, (ii) ly > 0, and (iii) kyl Sp. Prove that A ={a3"b"c?" | n 2 0 } is not a regular language. S= 6.[15 points] Recall the pumping lemma for regular languages: Theorem: For every regular...
(d) Let L be any regular language. Use the Pumping Lemma to show that In > 1 such that for all w E L such that|> n, there is another string ve L such that lvl <n. (4 marks) (e) Let L be a regular language over {0,1}. Show how we can use the previous result to show that in order to determine whether or not L is empty, we need only test at most 2" – 1 strings. (2...
Show that there exists a non-regular language that satisfies the pumping lemma. In particular, you can consider the following language. nan . You need to show that (1) L is not regular, and (2) L satisfies the pumping lemma. Show that there exists a non-regular language that satisfies the pumping lemma. In particular, you can consider the following language. nan . You need to show that (1) L is not regular, and (2) L satisfies the pumping lemma.
Use the pumping lemma to show that each of the following languages is not regular. L = {0i 1j 0k |k > i + j} Not entierly sure what to do when there are 3 variables.
Prove that the following languages are not regular. You may use the pumping lemma and the closure of the class of regular languages under union, intersection, and compliment. a){} b){} c) { is not a palindrome} *d)} 0"1"0" m,n>0
Use the pumping lemma to show that the following language is not regular: L = {bi ajbi : i, j ≥ 1}
Use pumping lemma to show that whether L ={ aib3i | i≥1000 and i≤4000} is non-regular or regular. Show your steps against each of the pumping lemma claims.
Use the pumping lemma for regular languages to carefully prove that the language { aibjck : 0≤ i < j < k } is not regular.
Prove the following language is not regular (you may use pumping lemma and the closure of the class of regular languages under union, intersection, and complement.): (w | w ∈ {0,1}* is not a palindrome} Please show work/explain. Thanks.