Question

Caution Is in Order 321 Case: The Blindsider not look forward to going to the staff meetings that his middle-manager George dce each week. He did not always feel this way about the meetings, in fact did not ago he rather enjoyed what he believed were productive and e meetings, in fact, up de the difference was one change in the membership of this group of addition of Charlie, who replaced a usually silent supervisor of one of h congenial supervisors: the building services sections. ke his predecessor, Charlie was anything but usually silent In fact, it seerned as h Charlie had made it a point to become conversant with every section of the ory, and he almost always had something critical to say about the weekly reports of the other supervisors What bothered George most was Charlie's approach to getting his issues or criticisms hle Charlie seemed to focus exclusively on problems and weaknesses. As if that asn't bad enough, what George resented most was Charlie's way of introducing a on in itself wasn't bad e problem or concern in a way was commenting on. It was Charlie's meeting, or weakness at the same time the others learned of it. that ensured maximum embarrassment for whoever's area he practice to openly drop his little bombshells in the staff where the supervisor whose area was in question first heard of a so-called problem It seemed to George that Charlie's practice of blindsiding the others in the group was coldly calculated to make himself look better by making others look worse. And George found it even more frustrating to note that their boss did not seem to recognize what Charlie was doing Questions 1. Do you believe there is anything George can do about Charlie's staff meeting behavior? If so, how should he proceed? Do you believe George should take up his concerns directly with Charlie? Why or why not? 2.

Answer 1

1.Behaviour of a person cannot be changed or altered by someone because it forms individual's characteristics.George at the meeting can provide his suggestion, happening or points from his end to defend Charlie's comment  if found any mistake and leading a healthy talk in presence of the head and find a solution with the help of them

2.Taking up directly to a person is possible only when the opposing party is in a state to listen and correct oneself.When George tries to take up his concern directly to Charlie it could sometimes end in cold war between them in the work place so it is better to be discussed in the meeting, because meetings are conducted to rectify faults and go for appraisal for an organization progress.