Question

In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using...

In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 6.0 and a standard deviation of 2.2. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 7.9 and a standard deviation of 2.7. Complete parts​ (a) through​ (c) below.

a. Construct the 90​% confidence interval estimate of the mean pain score for patients given the magnet treatment.

What is the confidence interval estimate of the population mean μ​?

(blank) < μ < (blank) ​(Round to one decimal place as​ needed.)

B. Construct the 90​% confidence interval estimate of the mean pain score for patients given the sham treatment.

What is the confidence interval estimate of the population mean μ​?

(blank) < μ < (blank) ​(Round to one decimal place as​ needed.)

c. Compare the results. Does the treatment with magnets appear to be​ effective?

A.Since the confidence intervals overlap, it appears that the magnet treatments are more effective than the sham treatments.

B.Since the confidence intervals ​overlap, it appears that the magnet treatments are less effective than the sham treatments.

C.Since the confidence intervals do not ​overlap, it appears that the magnet treatments are less effective than the sham treatments.

D. Since the confidence intervals do not ​overlap, it appears that the magnet treatments are more effective than the sham treatments.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

a.

Standard error of sample mean = s / \sqrt{n} = 2.2 / V40 = 0.3478505

Degree of freedom, df = 40 - 1 = 39

Critical value of t at df = 39 and 90% confidence interval is 1.685

Margin of error = t * Standard error = 1.685 * 0.3478505 = 0.586

90% confidence interval is,

(6 - 0.586, 6 + 0.586)

(5.4, 6.6)

5.4 < μ < 6.6

b.

Standard error of sample mean = s / \sqrt{n} = 2.7 / V40 = 0.4269075

Degree of freedom, df = 40 - 1 = 39

Critical value of t at df = 39 and 90% confidence interval is 1.685

Margin of error = t * Standard error = 1.685 * 0.4269075 = 0.719

90% confidence interval is,

(7.9 - 0.719, 7.9 + 0.719)

(7.2, 8.6)

7.2 < μ < 8.6

c.

D. Since the confidence intervals do not ​overlap, it appears that the magnet treatments are more effective than the sham treatments.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 patients...

    In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 10.0 10.0 and a standard deviation of 2.2. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a...

  • In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 4040 patients...

    In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 4040 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​ treatments, the 4040 patients had pain scores with a mean of 11.011.0 and a standard deviation of 2.52.5. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 4040 patients had pain scores with a mean...

  • In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a s...

    In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 40 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean of 12.0 and a standard deviation of 2.8. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 40 patients had pain scores with a mean...

  • In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 35 patients...

    In a study designed to test the effectiveness of magnets for treating back​ pain, 35 patients were given a treatment with magnets and also a sham treatment without magnets. Pain was measured using a scale from 0​ (no pain) to 100​ (extreme pain). After given the magnet​ treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean of 12.0 and a standard deviation of 2.5. After being given the sham​ treatments, the 35 patients had pain scores with a mean...

  • Treatment Sham Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The...

    Treatment Sham Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment (with magnets) group and the sham (or placebo) group. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. Use a 0.05...

  • Treatment Sham Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The...

    Treatment Sham Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment (with magnets) group and the sham (or placebo) group. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. Use a 0.05...

  • חן х Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating Treatment Sham...

    חן х Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating Treatment Sham back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment (with magnets) group and P the sham (or placebo) group. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. 11 12 Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from 12 12 normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard 0.54 0.45 deviations are equal....

  • Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results...

    Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment​ (with magnets) group and the sham​ (or placebo) group. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed​ populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts​ (a) and​ (b) below. Use a 0.05 significance level...

  • Treatment Sham Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain....

    Treatment Sham Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment (with magnets) group and the sham (or placebo) group. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Complete parts (a) and (b) below. 17 0.57 x...

  • Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results...

    Researchers conducted a study to determine whether magnets are effective in treating back pain. The results are shown in the table for the treatment (with magnets) group and the sham (or placebo) group. The results are a measure of reduction in back pain. Assume that the two samples are independent simple random samples selected from normally distributed populations, and do not assume that the population standard deviations are equal. Use a 0.05 significance level for both parts. Treatment: µ=µ1; n=14;...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT