Question

1. Py --> [ (Qy ● Ry) v Sy ] 2. (Qy ● Ry) ---> ~ Py 3. Ty ---> ~ Sy // (Py --> ~Ty) Prove valid using the 18 rules of inference.

1. Py --> [ (Qy ● Ry) v Sy ]

2. (Qy ● Ry) ---> ~ Py

3. Ty ---> ~ Sy

// (Py --> ~Ty)

Prove valid using the 18 rules of inference.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Proof: Assuma Py as additional premise by Rule c stalements Pu→[c@y . RJ) Sy] premise 2 premise 3 premase Additional premise

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
1. Py --> [ (Qy ● Ry) v Sy ] 2. (Qy ● Ry) ---> ~ Py 3. Ty ---> ~ Sy // (Py --> ~Ty) Prove valid using the 18 rules of inference.
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT