Question

equal at the 5 percent siguificance level. 2. Still considering the data from timetofail: redo the test, this time NOT ass
1 type 1 type2 3.19 4.26 3.03 5.53 5.6 9.3 9.92 12.51 12.95 15.21 4.47 4.53 4.67 4.69 12.78 6.79 16.049.37 12.75 10 16.84 12
1. Consider the spreadsheet timetofail. This contains data on the time to fail of a certain type of bolt that receives a ty
equal" at the 5 percent siguificance level. 2. Still considering the data from "timetofail": redo the test, this time NOT assuming normality of the data. Use a non-parametric test.
1 type 1 type2 3.19 4.26 3.03 5.53 5.6 9.3 9.92 12.51 12.95 15.21 4.47 4.53 4.67 4.69 12.78 6.79 16.049.37 12.75 10 16.84 12
1. Consider the spreadsheet "timetofail". This contains data on the time to fail of a certain type of bolt that receives a type of treatment. The data is NOT paired data. If you assume normality of the data and assume equal variances, test the null hypothesis "the times to fail are equal" versus "not equal" at the 5 percent significance level. 2. Still considering the data from "timetofail": redo the test, this time NOT assuming normality of the data. Use a non-parametric test
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

1.

We find the mean and standard deviation of both the samples as:

For Type 1,

The sample size is n- 10. The provided sample data along with the data required to compute the sample mean X and sample variaThe sample mean X is computed as follows: 106.93 = 10,693 8 Also, the sample variance s is 106.932 1352.432 23.226 10 --) 10-

Ý, 10.693

Si-4.819

For Type 2,

The sample size is n- 10. The provided sample data along with the data required to compute the sample mean X and sample variaThe sample mean X is computed as follows: = 6.75 i16.75 TL Also, the sample variance s2 is 12.977 n-1 TL Therefore, the sampl

\bar{X_2} =6.75

Ss 3.602

Now, we conduct T-test for Means as :

The provided sample means are shown below: X 10.693 X 6.75 Also, the provided sample standard deviations are.: S1 4.819 82 3.

Hence, it is found that the critical value for this two-tailed test is t 2.101, for a 0.05 and df- 18. The rejection region f

Hence, there is not enough evidence to conclude that the time to fail of a two type of bolts is different at 5% level of significance.

2.

Here, we conduct Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test as :

First, we put both samples together and organize it in ascending order, which is shown in the table below: Sample Value 3.03

12.75 12.78 12.95 15.21 6.04 6.84 Now, that the values that are in ascending order are assigned ranks to them, taking care of

5.53 5.6 6.79 10 10 9.3 9.37 12 12 9.92 13 13 12.51 12.75 15 15 16 12.78 16 17 17 12.95 18 15.21 18 19 16.04 19 20 20 16.84 Tand the sum of ranks of sample 2 is R2 2+3+4+5+6+7+10+12 +15 +16 80 Hence, the test statistic is RR1 130. (1) Null and AlternHo : Median(Difference)0

H, : Median(Difference) 0

The critical value for the signficance level provided and the type of tail is Rc hypothesis is rejected if R 〈 52. 52, and th

Hence, there is not enough evidence to conclude that the time to fail of a two type of bolts is different at 5% level of significance.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
equal" at the 5 percent siguificance level. 2. Still considering the data from "timetofail": redo the test, this time NOT assuming normality of the data. Use a non-parametric test....
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • I he accompanying data are the times to failure (in milions per cycle) of high-speed turbine engine bearings made out o...

    I he accompanying data are the times to failure (in milions per cycle) of high-speed turbine engine bearings made out of two ditferent compounds. These were taken from "Analysis of Single Classincation Experiments Based on Censored Samples trom the Two parameter Weibull Distribution" bry J.I. McCool (The Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 1979 Compound 1 Compound 2 3.19 5.53 4.26 4.47 5.60 9.30 4.53 9.92 4.67 12.51 4.69 12.95 15.21 6.79 16.04 9.37 16.84 12.75 a) Find the 0.34...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT