(1) Let
be the splitting field, and let
be a
root of
. Since
is abelian, every subgroup of it is normal. By fundamental theorem
of Galois theory, every subfield of
is a normal extension of
. In
particular, the extension
is normal (and separable too because we are in characteristic
zero). Since
is normal and
contains one root of the irreducible polynomial
, it must contain all the roots of
. But then,
is the splitting field of
. This implies
(2) Consider the polynomial
in
. We
claim that
is irreducible in
.
This is equivalent to
being irreducible in, and
this irreducibility follows from Eisenstein.
Note that the zeros of
are as follows: since
the zeros of
are
The splitting field of
thus contains
But all the roots above lies in
, which must thus be the splitting field. Therefore, the Galois
group of
is
Thus, the Galois group of irreducible
is abelian does not necessarily imply it is cyclic.
Q2
(m) = n/(m + n). Prove that :N → R by define 2. For n
(m) = n/(m + n). Prove that :N → R by define 2. For n
Please answer in detail, and most importantly correctly.
Thankyou
Prove Taylor's inequality for n = 2, that is, prove that if If'"(x)| M for lx-al d, then 1R2(x) l s 쯩lx-a13 for lx-al sd This answer has not been graded yet. Need Help? Read It Talk to a Tutor Submit Answer Save Progress
Prove Taylor's inequality for n = 2, that is, prove that if If'"(x)| M for lx-al d, then 1R2(x) l s 쯩lx-a13 for lx-al sd This answer...
Problem 1. Let A be an m x m matrix. (a) Prove by induction that if A is invertible, then for every n N, An is invertible. (b) Prove that if there exists n N such that An is invertible, then A is invertible. (c) Let Ai, . . . , An be m x m matrices. Prove that if the product Ai … An is an invertible matrix, then Ak is invertible for each 1 < k< n. (d)...
a) Prove algebraically that(m+n | p+n)≥(m | p) for all m, p, n ∈
N and such that m≥p.
b) Prove the above inequality by providing a combinatorial
proof. Hint: this can be done by creating a story to count the RHS
exactly (and explain why that count is correct), and then providing
justification as to why the LHS counts a larger number of
options.
a) Prove algebraically that p for all m, p, n EN, and such that m...
1. Prove that there are no Let m, n E Z with m, n > 3 and gcd(m, n) of mn. primitive roots
1. Prove that there are no Let m, n E Z with m, n > 3 and gcd(m, n) of mn. primitive roots
Prove that for two machines M and N, M indistinguishable from N does not imply that M has the same behavior as N. Hint: one way to prove this is to exhibit two machines, a two state machine M and a three state machine N, both over X = {0,1} and Y = {0,1} with this property
Prove that the language is regular or not. {a^nb^m | n >= m and m <= 481}
Let be such that Prove that thenAE Mmxn AT A= I n. m> n AE Mmxn AT A= I n. m> n
(a) Let G be a graph with order n and size m. Prove that if (n-1) (n-2) m 2 +2 2 then G is Hamiltonian. (b) Let G be a plane graph with n vertices, m edges and f faces. Using Euler's formula, prove that nmf k(G)+ 1 where k(G) is the mumber of connected components of G.
(a) Let G be a graph with order n and size m. Prove that if (n-1) (n-2) m 2 +2 2 then...
Prove that if k divides n and m (k, n, m ∈ Z), then k divides n − m. Please provide steps and explanation to get upvote