Question

I need a thesis statement and two or three counter argument for the topic of "Treatment of young sex offenders in the US and South Africa "

Answer 1

Treatment of young sex offenders in the US

All sex offender registers in the US stem from public outrage as a reaction to highprofile child abduction and murder cases by strangers. The Jacob Wetteriing Crimes against Chiiddren and SexuaHy Vioeent Offender Registration Act, 1994 became effective in 1994 following 11-year-old Jacob Wetterling was snatched by an outsider at gunpoint. The Act obliges states to build up a library of sentenced sex guilty parties, indicating the sex wrongdoings which would make a wrongdoer at risk to having his or her name entered in the vault, the day and age wrongdoers' names ought to stay on the vault, and how the database ought to be maintained. The WetterHng Act was changed later in the year to incorporate Megan's Law. This government law obliges all states to "discharge significant data that is important to secure people in general concerning a particular individual required to register". The rule ordered that sex wrongdoer data sites be made and kept up by each state and made accessible for open viewing. A further administrative enlistment framework for sex wrongdoers was made in 1996 with the death of the Pam Lychner Sexual Offender Tracking and Identification Act, 1996. This Act was repealed by the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act of 2006 (AWA), however the national registry created by the 1996 Act was incorporated into the AWA. Like Megan's Law, the AWA directs all states to integrate and coordinate sex offender information, and to maintain the websites for general public access and notification.

Right now, every one of the 50 states have passed some kind of open warning law. These laws change significantly in their execution, with the end goal that the situation in no two states is indistinguishable. A few resolutions order proactive warning; others approve just notice, while a few permit notice just if network security is of concern. Strategies for notice have included giving a 800-telephone number, access through the Internet, composed solicitations; or effectively informing particular networks through the mail, flyer dissemination, network gatherings or face to face.

As admitted by AWA, the reason for keeping an enlist is to shield general society from sex guilty parties as a reaction to "the horrendous assaults by brutal predators". A sex guilty party is viewed as any person who submits a sexual offense, independent of whether it was submitted against a tyke or a grown-up. Indicted sex guilty parties are required to enroll before the finish of their correctional facility terms, while non-custodial wrongdoers must enlist somewhere around three days subsequent to being condemned. Points of interest to be recorded in the enroll incorporates the wrongdoer's name, standardized savings number, a duplicate of the guilty party's personality card or driver's permit, all locations of home, place of business or study, a depiction of any vehicle worked, the tag number(s), a physical portrayal of the guilty party, past feelings, the momentum status of the wrongdoer, a current photo, finger and palm prints, and a DNA sample.The subtle elements of the sex wrongdoers are recorded in the enlist for a foreordained day and age, contingent upon the level characterization in which the particular guilty party falls. The higher the tier, the more probable the risk to re-offend.

"Treatment of young sex offenders in the south africa"

In SA, sexual crimes are of "grave concern, as [they have] a particularly disadvantageous impact on vulnerable persons".

After an exceedingly exposed severe assault of a nine-month-old child young lady in 2001, the then Western Cape chief voiced people in general's antagonistic vibe towards sexual infringement as a shock against mankind and expressed that "sentenced sexual guilty parties ought to never again be permitted to live as free men or ladies". A national sex wrongdoer enlist was viewed as a conceivable answer for the issue. It is consequently clear that an impulse like those accomplished in the US and the UK prompted the inevitable origination of SA's NRSO, despite the fact that the issue was explored for very nearly 10 years.

Section 6 of the Criminal Law (Sexual Offenses and Reaated Matters) Amendment Act 32 of 2007 makes the NRSO, which intends to build social powers over sexual degenerates. Measures are acquainted with fix the prerequisites of the enroll and to enhance the recording of asserted or indicted sex guilty parties with the end goal to deny any conceivable work openings where youngsters or rationally incapacitated people are available. According to section 42(1), the details of all offenders found guilty of sexual crimes against children or mentally ill persons or even those who are alleged to have committed a sexual offence and have been dealt with in terms of section 77(6) or 78(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act 51 of 1977 have to be included in this register. These points of interest incorporate the name, any monikers or epithets, calling or exchange of the individual, physical and postal location, personality number, international ID number, and driver's permit number of the guilty party. The idea of the wrongdoing, the date of the offense, the case number and the court in which the preliminary occurred, the place of conviction and important jail distinguishing proof number (if material) will likewise be noted. The Act presents upon the Minister of Justice the competency to select a fit and legitimate individual as enlistment center, who is entrusted with entering all wrongdoers inside this classification into the NRSO, paying little heed to whether they were affirmed to have submitted a sexual offense or were discovered blameworthy previously or after the coming into power of the Act or whether their feelings or asserted transgressions were submitted in or outside the Republic.