Please answer the short question.
As for my personal perspective, I might avoid doing tattoo on my body but I have piercing in my ears. The reason of not getting tattoo is that I might get some peer pressure of preventing those actions. Also, I might not like the idea of getting permanently inked my body. Besides, there are some cultures which might prevent us from doing so.
In case of employment, the employers as per their company's policies might avoid certain kinds of body or face tattoo and piercing. There is a thing that employees may get lesser chance of getting hired due to their face or body tattoo or some piercing which is not common. Employers may tends to think that these type of candidates might not get serious for their job.
Hope this helps :)
Please answer the short question. 1 - Explain fully your reasons for getting or not getting a tattoo, piercing, or cutt...
Please answer the short question.
1 - Explain fully your reasons for getting or not getting a tattoo, piercing, or cutting. Also discuss your Opinion regarding how potential employers might view certain body decorations such as tattoos, Piercings and cuttings. For example, does your current employer allow pierced ears, but not pierced Nose rings. What do you think others might be perceive as the reason for body decorations? 200 word minimum.|
Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are inseparable. For B-Money, the two predictably merged when he was negotiat- ing a deal for his tracks. At other times, the merger is unpredictable, like when your business faces an unexpected auto accident, product recall, or government regulation change. In either type of situation, when business owners know the law, they can better protect themselves and sometimes even avoid the problems completely. This chapter...
Read the following case:
Answer the questions accordingly:
PLEASE MAKE COPY PASTE AVAILABLE
EEOC v. Management Hospitality of Racine 666 F.3d 422 (7th Cir. 2012) OPINION BY DISTRICT JUDGE YOUNG: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") brought this action on behalf of two serv- ers, Katrina Shisler and Michelle Powell, who were em- ployed at an International House of Pancakes franchise in Racine, Wisconsin (the "Racine IHOP"), alleging that the servers were sexually harassed in violation of Title VII of...