If operating income could be manipulated by allocating over-or underapplied overhead, why don't GAAP always requires allocation?
Financial statement manipulation is an ongoing problem in corporate America. Although the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken many steps to mitigate this type of corporate malfeasance, the structure of management incentives, the enormous latitude afforded by the Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and the ever-present conflict of interest between the independent auditor and the corporate client continues to provide the perfect environment for such activity. Due to these factors, investors who purchase individual stocks or bonds must be aware of the issues, warning signs and the tools that are at their disposal in order to mitigate the adverse implications of these problems.There are a host of factors that may affect the quality and accuracy of the data at an investor's disposal. As a result, investors must have a working knowledge of financial statement analysis, including a strong command of the use of internal liquidity solvency analysis ratios, external liquidity marketability analysis ratios, growth, and corporate profitability ratios, financial risk ratios and business risk ratios. Investors should also have a strong understanding of how to use market multiple analysis, including the use of price/earnings ratios, price/book value ratios, price/sales ratios and price/cash flow ratios in order to gauge the reasonableness of the financial data.
If operating income could be manipulated by allocating over-or underapplied overhead, why don't GAAP always requires all...
Could a manager increase the company's operating income by allocating over-or underapplied overhead allocation to work in process, finished goods and cost of goods sold?
At star plastics, the balance in manufacturing overhead (which represents over or underapplied overhead) is always closed to Cost of goods sold. This is done even when the balance is relatively large. Suzette Barger, the controller, explains that this makes sense because Star uses a just-in-time (JIT) manufacturing system and jobs are shipped to customers within hours of being completed. Write a paragraph elaborating on the justification provided by Suzette Barger. Why is there no need to apportion the...
At the end of the year, overhead applied was $3,717,000. Actual overhead was $3,145,000. Closing over/underapplied overhead into Cost of Goods Sold would cause net income toa.increase by $572,000b.decrease by $572,000c.increase by $1,144,000d.decrease by $1,144,000
Answer All Questions: 1. Compute the company's predetermined overhead rate. 2. Compute the underapplied or overapplied overhead. 3. Assume that the company closes any underapplied or overapplied overhead directly to Cost of Goods Sold. Prepare the appropriate journal entry. 4. Assume that the company allocates any underapplied or overapplied overhead to Work in Process, Finished Goods, and Cost of Goods Sold on the basis of the amount of overhead applied that remains in each account at the end of the...
In a cost accounting system, why will factory overhead always be either over applied or under applied before adjustments at the accounting period?
"At the end of the year, all manufacturing overhead transactions are complete. There is no further opportunity for offsetting events to occur. At this point, Wallace Company eliminates any balance in Manufacturing Overhead by an adjusting entry. It considers under‐ or overapplied overhead to be an adjustment to cost of goods sold. Thus, Wallace debits underapplied overhead to Cost of Goods Sold. It credits overapplied overhead to Cost of Goods Sold. After Wallace posts this entry, Manufacturing Overhead has a...
Absorption and Variable Costing with Over- and Underapplied Overhead Flaherty, Inc., has just completed its first year of operations. The unit costs on a normal costing basis are as follows: Manufacturing costs (per unit): Direct materials (2 lbs. @ 1.25) $2.50 Direct labor (0.4 hr. @ 15.00) 6.00 Variable overhead (0.4 hr. @ 5.00) 2.00 Fixed overhead (0.4 hr. @ 7.00) 2.80 Total $13.30 Selling and administrative costs: Variable $1.80 per unit Fixed $221,500 During the year, the company had...
Accounting experts please help ! Always Thumbs up for correct answers Problem 3-12 Predetermined Overhead Rate; Disposing of Underapplied or Overapplied Overhead (LO3- Luzadis Company makes furniture using the latest automated technology. The company uses a job-order costing system and applies manufacturing overhead cost to products on the basis of machine-hours. The predetermined overhead rate was based on a cost formula that estimates $1,520,000 of total manufacturing overhead for an estimated activity level of 76,000 machine-hours. During the year, a...
Absorption and Variable Costing with Over- and Underapplied Overhead Flaherty, Inc., has just completed its first year of operations. The unit costs on a normal costing basis are as follows: Manufacturing costs (per unit): Direct materials (3 lbs. @ 1.30) $3.90 Direct labor (0.4 hr. @ 17.50) 7.00 Variable overhead (0.4 hr. @ 4.00) 1.60 Fixed overhead (0.4 hr. @ 6.00) 2.40 Total $14.90 Selling and administrative costs: Variable $1.60 per unit Fixed $217,500 During the year, the company had...
Why is hyperinflation and deflation bad for an economy? (You don't have to go over everything as this could cause you to write for the rest of your life. Please just choose one thing mentioned in the book about hyperinflation and another deflation and elaborate on it). Why is hyperinflation and deflation bad for an economy? (You don't have to go over everything as this could cause you to write for the rest of your life. Please just choose one...