Question

(10 pts.) Comment on the model e) f) (5 pts.) What is the intention to cyberloaf score of a student, whose attitude score is 4.2, subjective norm score is 1.3 and gender is Female? Table 2: Task performance with respect to gender and cyberloafing df MS SS Source 0.003 9.226 12.030 12.030 1 Gender 0.000 9.145 11.924 23.848 2 Cyberloafing Cyberloafing Gender 0.013 4.445 5.795 11.590 1.304 357.262 274 Error 3678.898 280 Total Estimated Marginal Means of Taskperformance Cyberloafing -Low -Moderate High se 3.00 (1 226 Male Female Gender 28 Figure 1: Mean plot of task performance comparison of cyberloafing and gender Estimated Marginal Means A

Answer 1

e) The overall model is significant as the F-statistic = 56.425 has a significant p-value which is less than 0.05. Hence, we can say that the model is effective in predicting the intention to cyberloaf.
The R-square value is 0.671 which tells us that the model explains 67.1 % variation of the dependent variable which is good.

f) The least squares equation is:
Intention to cyberloaf = 1.961 + 0.308*Attitude - 0.902*Subjective + 0.235*Subjective*Attitude + 0.403*Gender
Attitude = 4.2, Subjective Norm Score = 1.3, Gender = 0
Hence, Intention = 1.961 + 0.308*4.2 - 0.902*1.3 + 0.235*4.2*1.3 + 0.403*0
Intention to cyberloaf = 3.3651