Answer all the questions please Station 4: Tooth Proportions (Measure the Specimens from Stations 2 and...
Station 4: Tooth Proportions (Measure the Specimens from Stations 2 and 3) 1 The relative size of the anterior and posterior dentition has changed through time and is dependent upon dietary adaptations. Tooth proportions can be measured to track that change. Measure the width (side to side) of a central upper incisor and of an upper second molar (lingual side to buccal side). Then calculate an index to obtain a ratio of incisor-to-molar width Incisor width x 100 Molar width Incisor width M2 width Index Chimpanzee 3 5mm A, afarensis 3 mm 4mm (93 A. africanus 8 Robust australopith Modern human 4 Many of the fossil casts lack teeth, or are missing the teeth you were asked to measure. Just put "missing" in the box if this is the case. However, if you look at photos of the specimens in the book or review the information on the section for the species earlier in this chapter, you may get an idea about size of incisors and molars. In that case, you can put a descriptive term instead of a measurement. You could even measure the teeth in photos if necessary 2 What did this tell you about tooth proportions-the relative size of incisors and molars? Do any of these specimens group together with similar measurements (or similar descriptions)? 3 Given that the ape is presumably the most similar to the common ancestral condition, and A. afarensis is the oldest australopith, and humans obviously the most recent, can you say anything about trends in tooth proportion over time? 376 Exploring Physical Anthropology
Station 4: Tooth Proportions (Measure the Specimens from Stations 2 and 3) 1 The relative size of the anterior and posterior dentition has changed through time and is dependent upon dietary adaptations. Tooth proportions can be measured to track that change. Measure the width (side to side) of a central upper incisor and of an upper second molar (lingual side to buccal side). Then calculate an index to obtain a ratio of incisor-to-molar width Incisor width x 100 Molar width Incisor width M2 width Index Chimpanzee 3 5mm A, afarensis 3 mm 4mm (93 A. africanus 8 Robust australopith Modern human 4 Many of the fossil casts lack teeth, or are missing the teeth you were asked to measure. Just put "missing" in the box if this is the case. However, if you look at photos of the specimens in the book or review the information on the section for the species earlier in this chapter, you may get an idea about size of incisors and molars. In that case, you can put a descriptive term instead of a measurement. You could even measure the teeth in photos if necessary 2 What did this tell you about tooth proportions-the relative size of incisors and molars? Do any of these specimens group together with similar measurements (or similar descriptions)? 3 Given that the ape is presumably the most similar to the common ancestral condition, and A. afarensis is the oldest australopith, and humans obviously the most recent, can you say anything about trends in tooth proportion over time? 376 Exploring Physical Anthropology