Question

What has been the impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) on healthcare access, cost, and quality?

Who was newly covered and how is this achieved?

What are exchanges and how are different States approaching them?

What does the Medicaid program have to do with the ACA? How are health insurance premiums being affected?

What variables are in play in the political debate over the impact of the ACA on cost, access, and quality of care?

What are some of the key challenges facing state and national policy makers?

On balance, is the ACA a good or bad law? Provide a clear, fact-based, non-emotional justification for your conclusion.

Is healthcare a right? Why or why not?

What role should the federal government play in healthcare given the 10th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

Please provide answer in the format of paragraph instead of a one by one in a paragraph of at least 250 words. Thank you

Answer 1

Many research studies conducted in order evaluate the impact of affordable care act on health care access reveals that gaining the insurance coverage through the expansions and extension to the population increased the probability of having usual care, with its cost effectiveness and quality of care was pretty good and the studies also states the ACA decreased the number of uninsured Americans but also increased coverage to millions of Americans. The newly covered insurance was that the insurance allowed the children to stay on their parents insurance upto the age of 26, and is being achieved by the wide spread combination of all the usage of the insurance. The exchangers are the individuals who are combined with their medicaid insurance, as these exchanges are costly and they have to be payed by the tax payers and each states are provided with the deadline. If a person is a legal resident of the united states he can buy this ACA when the individual is not eligible for medicare, the main motto of ACA was that all the legal residents with the income of upto138% of FPL would be under the free medicaid service. The political debate happens is that the overall insurance was being covered by the population and increased the people's access to health care. There are different challenges faced by the policy makers are like to assess the individual to cover the insurance and get access to evaluate the states under federal APA is being utilised in the given period of time. Thus ACA is the good law amended as it shows an transparent access of every individual to the health care with proper quality and coverage which in many research showed a statistical improvement of population using health care. Therefore health care is the fundamental right of every citizen born in that country and the health care accessibility, cost effectiveness and quality of care should reach wide spread in the grass root level among whole of the US. But still on the other side The tenth amendment states in a different way and the federal government should take few consideration of making states participate to take up this insurance with few changes,wereby the states clauses are not been affected.