On December 31, 2015, Culver Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Culver Co. agreed to accept a $318,100 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Culver is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 5%.
Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2015, for the Culver Co.
First we will have to calculate the service revenue earned by Culver.
Service revenue earned by Culver in 2015 = amount of notes receivable*PVIF (11%, 2)
Using the present value interest factor (PVIF) table we find that for 11% and 2 years the applicable discount factor = 0.8116
Thus revenue = 318,100*0.8116 = 258,170
Difference between the note value and service revenue will be the discount amount. Hence discount = 318,100 - 258,170 = 59,930
Thus journal entry for Culver:
Date | Particulars | Debit | Credit |
12/31/2015 | Notes receivable | 318,100 | |
Discount on notes receivable | 59,930 | ||
Service revenue | 258,170 |
On December 31, 2015, Culver Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short...
On December 31, 2015, Swifty Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Swifty Co. agreed to accept a $293,800 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Swifty is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2015, for the Swifty...
?On December 31, 2015, Bonita Co. performed environmental
consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and
Bonita Co. agreed to accept a $346,500 zero-interest-bearing note
due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a
credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Bonita is
much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%.
On December 31, 2015, Tamarisk Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Tamarisk Co. agreed to accept a $262,700 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Tamarisk is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Assuming Tamarisk Co.’s fiscal year-end is December 31, prepare the journal entry for December 31,...
On December 31, 2015, Tamarisk Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Tamarisk Co. agreed to accept a $262,700 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Tamarisk is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Assuming Tamarisk Co.’s fiscal year-end is December 31, prepare the journal entry for December 31,...
On December 31, 2015, Riverbed Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Riverbed Co. agreed to accept a $298,600 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 10%. Riverbed is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. A) Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2015, for the...
On December 31, 2020, Blue Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Blue Co. agreed to accept a $322,700 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2022, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 10%. Blue is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2020, for the Blue...
On December 31, 2020, Blue Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Blue Co. agreed to accept a $322,700 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2022, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 10%. Blue is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2020, for the Blue...
On December 31, 2015, Ayayai Co. performed environmental
consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and
Ayayai Co. agreed to accept a $252,100 zero-interest-bearing note
due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a
credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 10%. Ayayai is
much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%.
Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December
31, 2015, for the Ayayai...
Exercise 7-14 On December 31, 2015, Shamrock Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Shamrock Co. agreed to accept a $324,900 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2017, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Shamrock is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 6%. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of December 31, 2015, for...
On December 31, 2020, Carla Co. performed environmental consulting services for Hayduke Co. Hayduke was short of cash, and Carla Co. agreed to accept a $318,100 zero-interest-bearing note due December 31, 2022, as payment in full. Hayduke is somewhat of a credit risk and typically borrows funds at a rate of 11%. Carla is much more creditworthy and has various lines of credit at 5% - Your answer is partially correct. Prepare the journal entry to record the transaction of...