Question

Descriptive statistics like mean, median, range, and standard deviation can be used to summarize data. But the value isn't in knowing how to calculate these numbers, it's in knowing what they mean—or even which ones to consider. This discussion explores that by asking you to take a strictly hypothetical look at a serious circumstance.

An article you might want to consider in this context is Stephan Jay Gould’s The Median Isn’t the Message.

1. If you were diagnosed with a serious, potentially terminal illness, would you want your doctor to tell you how much time you had left? Why or why not?

2. As the internet now puts much of the world's best medical research at our fingertips, patients have access to more information than ever before. What statistical information would you seek out to help you assess your situation and plan your treatment? Discuss which measures for average (e.g. mean, median) and variation (e.g. range, standard deviation) would be more useful to you.

3. What are some of the dangers of providing or seeking out these kinds of medical statistics? Describe how matters could be complicated by a patient's poor understanding of statistics

Answer 1

Ans1:-I certainly wan that doctor tell me about how much time i had left because it gives me chance to do some further planning and also my family to become mentally prepared for this news as there is lots of prognosis study is present so the information can be given very effectively.

Ans 2:- I would preferred mean over median because most of study has large sample size and less outliers

And for variation I preferred standard deviation over range because it gives me more presice and specific data.

Ans:-3

There is a chance that patient read some study on Internet which is not true or not applicable in present scenario as patients are not aware of these facts so they can make questions on doctors prescription based on that study