why conditioning international trade on a poor country's improving labor and environmental standards to US levels is counterproductive?
The United States has been the pioneer of manufacturing process and has always helped in developing the best technologies which has largely been the reason for its rapid growth and overall development.
The world as we know it know is largely contributed due to the development of the internet as a medium of communication and has largely helped in overall development of the world. The contribution in this matter of the United States and the overall development of manufacturing techniques has largely helped the entire globe and has reduced costs of many activities such as banking and insurance effectively.
On the other hand, the United States has been extremely active in improving the working conditions in collaboration with World Organizations to help other countries have similar growth trends respectively. These include Asian counterparts such as India and China.
But, undeniably this has started to effect the United States counter productively in the long run now. With increased quality of labor and working conditions most companies including those from the United States are also turning over to these countries for shifting their overall production base even if it meant getting heavily taxed at home.
This happens because, even when the quality of the workforce has been increased, the overall costs have been low since there is a sizeable population. Once skills are imparted and people are ready to work at a relatively lower cost, The Trade for United States turns out to be counterproductive since manufacturing jobs are lost to those countries that have enabled themselves to produce at a relatively lower cost.
Thus the concept of controlled help has come into play where selective development can be done to ensure that the nations interests remain secured as well as overall regional development can take place without any hindrance respectively.
Please feel free to ask your doubts in the comments section
why conditioning international trade on a poor country's improving labor and environmental standards to US levels...
Discuss the reasons why using trade barriers will enforce labor or environmental standards maybe efficient thannother measures. cancel this question thanks
The best way to achieve better environmental and labor standards in developing nations is to: 1. negotiate strict standards in free trade agreements 2. poor countries should copy the standards of rich countries 3. rich countries should lower their tariff barriers to give greater access to the exports of poor countries 4. boycott the products of companies that appear to be violating the standards 5. prevent companies in developing nations from closing plants and moving them to poor countries
Globalization: Is the process of intensifying the connections between national economies through international trade, foreign direct investments by multinational firms, and international financial investments. Has been proven to worsen working conditions and increase poverty in poor countries. Requires governments to weaken labor and environmental regulations in order to remain competitive. Is coordinated by the International Labor Organization to ensure respect for the four core labor standards. Please explain. Thank you!
One of the areas addressed by the ISO 14000 series is environmental labeling. (PART A) How might individual firms benefit from using labeling standards? (PART B) How might international trade be affected?
One of the areas addressed by the ISO 14000 series is environmental labeling. (PART A) How might individual firms benefit from using labeling standards? (PART B) How might international trade be affected? Be specific and please don't send the same answer that is already posted.
In the practice of international trade, both physical resources and capital cross international borders rather freely, whereas labor is heavily restricted. In fact, it can be extremely difficult for individuals to obtain permits that allows them to be gainfully employed within many countries. Thus, although companies are free to set up production in markets where labor is cheap, labor cannot move to markets where wages are higher. Some argue that this locks poor people to their poor geographies and gives...
Why is there intra-industry trade between similar countries? Countries tend to make poor trade decisions There is no evidence of intra-industry trade Division of labor allows unique innovation Due to the prevalence of tariffs
The US has had the Affordable care act (ACA) since 2010 and health care is not improving. Why does the US still have poor outcomes for those with insurance? Why US has some worst health care outcomes? Please l need an explanation (50-100) words 2 references with citations (APA) style
Assume a simple model of the US economy with no international trade. Suppose the government, in an effort to stimulate the economy, increases its spending on goods and services without changing taxes. Using the model of the market for loanable funds, show how this policy will affect the levels of saving, investment, consumption, and total output in the long run. Explain your answers carefully Suppose the government did not change its level of spending but decreased taxes instead. Show how...
00:22 HB $BA (International Economics) The Ricardian Model: Trade Pattern Home has 1,200 units of labor available. It can produce two goods, apples and bananas. The unit labor requirement in apple production is 3, while in banana production it is 2. Foreign has a labor force of 800. Foreign's unit labor requirement in apple production is 5, while in banana production it is 1. a. What is the opportunity cost of apples in terms of bananas in Home? b. What...