You have asked three unrelated questions one after the other. I have addressed the first two. Please post the balance question separately.
Part (a)
Let F1 and F2 be the two factor premia respectively.
Average return, R = Rf + Beta1 x F1 + Beta2 x F2
Hence, for A: 10% = 2% + 1.5F1 + 0.4F2 i.e. 1.5F1 + 0.4F2 = 8% -------------- Eqn (1)
for B: 9% = 2% + 0.2F1 + 1.3F2 i.e. 0.2F1 + 1.3F2 = 7% --------------- Eqn (2)
0.2 x Eqn (1) - 1.5 x Eqn (2) results into:
(0.4 x 0.2 - 1.3 x 1.5) F2 = (0.2 x 8% - 7% x 1.5)
Hence, F2 = (0.2 x 8% - 7% x 1.5) / (0.4 x 0.2 - 1.3 x 1.5) = 0.047594 = 4.76%
From Eqn (2): F1 = (7% - 1.3F2) / 0.2 = (7% - 1.3 x 4.76%) / 0.2 = 4.06%
Hence, the risk premium for factor 1 = F1 = 4.06% and that for factor 2 = F2 = 4.76%
Part (b)
A = E + D
Hence, factor betas of assets = Weighted average factor betas of debt & equity
Hence, factor beta for factor 1 = 40% x 0 + 60% x 1.2 = 0.72
and factor beta for factor 2 = 40% x 0.1 + 60% x 1.3 = 0.82
No 4. a) Stocks have a two-factor structure. Two widely diversified portfolios have the following data....
Suppose you are working with two factor portfolios. Portfolio 1 and Portfolio 2. The portfolios have expected returns of 15% and 6%, respectively. Based on this information, what would be the expected return on well-diversified portfolio A TA has a beta of 1 on the first factor and 0 on the second factor? The risk-free rate is 3%. ? 3.00% O 12.096 ? 15.0% ? 6.00%
You want to find the expected return of your firm using the Fama-French model. The risk free rate is 0.020, and the expected market return is 0.149. The HML factor and the SMB factors have expected returns of 0.039, and 0.038, respectively. You measured the beta on the market, the HML factor, and the SMB factor as 0.6, 1.2, and 0.3, respectively. What is the expected return for your firm?
An analyst has modeled the stock of a company using a Fama-French three-factor model. The risk-free rate is 4%, the market return is 10%, the return on the SMB portfolio (rSMB) is 3.7%, and the return on the HML portfolio (rHML) is 4.9%. If ai = 0, bi = 1.2, ci = - 0.4, and di = 1.3, what is the stock's predicted return? Round your answer to two decimal places.
An analyst has modeled the stock of a company using a Fama-French three-factor model. The risk-free rate is 6%, the market return is 12%, the return on the SMB portfolio (rSMB) is 3.8%, and the return on the HML portfolio (rHML) is 4.6%. If ai = 0, bi = 1.2, ci = - 0.4, and di = 1.3, what is the stock's predicted return? Round your answer to two decimal places. %
2. Suppose there are two independent risk factors governing securities returns according to the two factor APT. The risk-free rate is 10%. The following well-diversified portfolios exist: beta with respect beta with respect Expected Return to factor 1 to factor 2 Portfolio #1 25% Portfolio #2 25% (a) What are the expected returns on each of the two risk factors in this economy? (b) Suppose another portfolio has a beta with respect to the first factor of 1, a beta...
3. To apply the Arbitrage Pricing Theory to find a stock return, you consider two factor portfolios, Portfolio A and Portfolio B. A stock has a beta of 1.2 on the first factor and a beta of 0.21 on the second factor. Portfolio A and Portfolio B have expected returns of 12% and 10%, respectively. If the risk-frerate is 3%, what must the expected return on this stock be?
Suppose that the rate of return on risky assets is given by the following single factor model: where F is the factor affecting returns on all securities and e, is a firm-specific dis- turbance. The risk-free rate is 4% and borrowing at this rate is possible. Two well- diversified portfolios P and Q are found to have the following expected returns and betas: E(rp) 12% ßP : 0.8 (a) Explain why these data are inconsistent with Arbitrage Pricing Theory (b)...
Consider the following data for a one-factor economy. All portfolios are well-diversified. Portfolio E(r) Beta A 12% 1.2 F 6% 0.0 Suppose that another portfolio, portfolio E, is well-diversified with a beta of 0.6 and expected return of 10%. Would an arbitrage opportunity exist? If so, what would the arbitrage strategy be? I need to solve this for a problem set and I am really confused as to how to go about it. Any explanations and answers would be appreciated.
Assume that you are using a two-factor APT model, with factors A and B, to find the fair expected return on a well-diversified portfolio Q that has an actual expected return of 18%. Portfolio Q's factor loadings (i.e., Q's betas on each of the two factors) and the factors' risk premiums are shown in the table below. Portfolios for factors A and B are tradable (i.e., you can take long or short positions in them). The risk-free rate is 3.5%....
Suppose there are two independent economic factors, M1 and M2. The risk-free rate is 5%, and all stocks have independent firm-specific components with a standard deviation of 52%. Portfolios A and B are both well diversified.Portfolio Beta on M1 Beta on M2 Exp.Return (%)A 1.6 2.5 31B. 2.4. -0.7. 12What is the expected return–beta relationship in this economy?Expected return–beta relationship E(rP) =5.00 % + ........ βP1 + ........βP2*The answers are not 5.014 and 7.191