Question

Do you think that food production was pre-requisite for large, stratified, societies with a specialized labor force? Why and why not?

Answer 1

Yes, I think sustenance generation was pre-imperative for enormous, stratified, social orders with a particular work power because:

Diamond stone advances this contention in Chapter Four, entitled "farmer Power." He brings up that social orders that create agribusiness can deliver increasingly steady and reliable sustenance sources, which encourages populace improvement. This happens both for the undeniable reason, that rural social orders can nourish more individuals and on the grounds that agriculturalists are bound to be inactive, making it simpler to bring up youngsters. Farming adds to the improvement of human progress in different ways, as well. Cultivating social orders produce surpluses that can bolster non-agriculturalists. This regularly prompts the advancement of administration and brought together political power. As Diamond sees on page. Put away nourishment is fundamental for sustaining non-sustenance creating pros, and positively for supporting entire towns of them. Consequently traveling seeker gatherer social orders have few or no full-time masters, who rather first show up in inactive social orders.

Farming additionally makes mechanical advancement conceivable, and it prompts a portion of the unintended results that added to the strength of European human advancements. Thickly populated developments that lived in nearness to domesticated animals, for instance, encountered the sorts of scourge illnesses that would crash Native American populaces.

Along these lines, cultivating adds to particular work, administration, and stratified social orders. It is an must for the enhancement politically brought together, socially stratified, monetarily perplexing, mechanically imaginative social orders."

‌