a) answers to pick: Find an innocent person guilty, Find a guilty person innocent, Find a guilty person guilty, find an innocent person innocent, find every person innocent, find every person guilty
b) same thing
a) Never make a Type I error means Jury can't reject the null hypothesis and hence, it will be forced to Find every person innocent.
b) Never make a Type II error means Jury will have to reject the null hypothesis and hence, it will be forced to Find every person guilty.
a) answers to pick: Find an innocent person guilty, Find a guilty person innocent, Find a...
(1 point) In the judicial system, the defense attorney argues for the null hvoothesis that the defendant is innocent. In general, what be the result if judges instructed juries to a) never make a type l error, the jury would then be forced 1 b) never make a type ll error, the jury would then be forced Find an innocent person guilty Find a guity person innocent Find a guilty person guilty Find an innocent person innocent Find every person...
Suppose the defendant in a particular judicial system is presumed guilty until proven innocent. What are the null and alternative hypotheses? What are the meanings of the risks of committing either a Type 1 or Type Il error? State the null and alternative hypotheses. Ho: The defendantis H: The defendant is What are the meanings of the risks of committing either a Typelor Type Il error? OA. A Type I error would be not convicting a guilty person. A Type...
In the U.S. court system, a defendant is assumed innocent until proved guilty. Suppose that you regard a court trial as a hypothesis test with null and alternative hypotheses: Null: Defendant is innocent Alternative: Defendant is guilty a. Explain the meaning of a Type I error b. Explain the meaning of a Type II error c. If you were the defendant, would you want alpha to be large or small? Explain your answer. d. If you were the prosecuting attorney,...
The notion of Type I and Type II Errors is very important in hypothesis testing. The Ho/Ha should be set up such that a Type I Error is more serious than a Type II Error. A common example used to discuss Type I and Type II errors is the example of a trial in the US. Under US law, a defendant is considered "innocent until proven guilty." You could set up this hypothesis test as follows: Ho: defendent is...
Question 12 1.6 pts What are the two arguments made in favor of grand juries? O That (a) the First Amendment is better protected by grand juries and (b) the Constitution as a whole would benefit from these juries. O That (a) grand juries of 16 to 23 citizens are in a better position to find someone guilty of a crime than a regular jury that consists of usually 12 people and (b) the prosecution is in a better position...
This problem is designed to give you an understanding of the methodology behind hypothesis testing. Ever wonder how someone in America can be arrested if they really are presumed innocent, why a defendant is found not guilty instead of innocent, or why Americans put up with a justice system which sometimes allows criminals to go free on technicalities? These questions can be understood by understanding the similarity of the American justice system to hypothesis testing in statistics and the two...
you must use the format provided below in order to brief the attached case 221 N.W.2d 609 (1974) John SALSBURY, Appellee, v. NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant. No. 55960. Supreme Court of Iowa. September 18, 1974. Laird, Burington, Bovard & Heiny, Mason City, and William F. McFarlin, Des Moines, for appellant. Boyd G. Hayes, Charles City, and William Pappas, Mason City, for appellee. Considered en banc. HARRIS, Justice. This is the third appeal in which we have considered a claim...
Read the following case:
Answer the questions accordingly:
PLEASE MAKE COPY PASTE AVAILABLE
EEOC v. Management Hospitality of Racine 666 F.3d 422 (7th Cir. 2012) OPINION BY DISTRICT JUDGE YOUNG: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") brought this action on behalf of two serv- ers, Katrina Shisler and Michelle Powell, who were em- ployed at an International House of Pancakes franchise in Racine, Wisconsin (the "Racine IHOP"), alleging that the servers were sexually harassed in violation of Title VII of...
Please read the article and answer about questions. You and the Law Business and law are inseparable. For B-Money, the two predictably merged when he was negotiat- ing a deal for his tracks. At other times, the merger is unpredictable, like when your business faces an unexpected auto accident, product recall, or government regulation change. In either type of situation, when business owners know the law, they can better protect themselves and sometimes even avoid the problems completely. This chapter...
i have the case study question with the answers but i need help
to re-write the answers.
please see the attached files
Case Study Analysis (CSF3003) Assessment Description and Requirements CLO1: Case Study 1 Ahmad lef home to study master and PhD in Australia. He has fees for the first semester only. After he arrived to Sydney and settled down, he start looking for a part-time job to save money for the next term. Ahmad has some experience on making...