Question

5. A screening test for diabetes, where a blood glucose of 180 mg/dl is considered positive, has a known sensitivity of 22.5% and a known specificity of 99.7%. The prevalence of diabetes in Town X is 2% and Town Y is 1.5%

6. Based on Q 5, assuming there are 10000 people living in Town Y, how many people will test positive and be referred for additional testing? a. 34 b. 64 c. 74 d. 150 e. 200 f 9936 g. None of the above

please answer the question 6 using the given information. Thank you

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

A - have diabetes

probability that someone will test positive = P(A) * sensitivity + P(A') * ( 1 - specificity)

for town Y

P(A) = 0.015

hence required number = 10000 * ( 0.015 * 0.225 + (1- 0.015) (1 - 0.997))

= 63.3

= 64

option B) is correct

Please rate

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
please answer the question 6 using the given information. Thank you 5. A screening test for...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Epidemiology question 3. ng the screening cut-off point affect sensitivity. specificity, PPV and NPV of the...

    Epidemiology question 3. ng the screening cut-off point affect sensitivity. specificity, PPV and NPV of the test? Why? are the respective "costs" ring the screening cut-off point affect the number of false positives and false negatives associated with false positives and false negativesi ? What 5. sensitivity, PPV and NPV of the test? How would you expect raising the cut-off point to 220mg of blood glucose per 100ml to affect the specificity was repeated using the 130mg of blood glucose...

  • The table shows the results of a screening test of fasting blood glucose with the cut-off...

    The table shows the results of a screening test of fasting blood glucose with the cut-off at 140 mg/dl. Compute the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values. Gold Standard for Diabetes Diagnosis Screening test Positive Negative Positive 34 20 54 Negative 116 9830 9946 150 9850 10000

  • Using the information from Part 2 and question 8 (the first picture). Can you answer numbers...

    Using the information from Part 2 and question 8 (the first picture). Can you answer numbers 12-14? Part Il Due to the low performance of the screening test above, the researchers dL. Using this . Of these, 66 decided to lower the cut-off point for defining positive cases to 90mg/ lower cut-off point, 230 people tested positive on the screening test people tested negative on the diagnostic test (that is, they did not have hypercholesterolemia). This yields Table 2 Table...

  • validity of a test HELP answer ALL you can !! ... imagine you are a physician...

    validity of a test HELP answer ALL you can !! ... imagine you are a physician discussing the results of a screening test with a patient. AC 1) If the test was positive, how likely is it that he really has the disease? [How worried should he be?] 2) If the test was negative, how likely is it that he really does NOT have it? (How reassured should he be?] 1) What does 1) represent? 0 1 Represents that the...

  • Scenario 1: The prevalence (a + c in the table below) of previously undetected diabetes in...

    Scenario 1: The prevalence (a + c in the table below) of previously undetected diabetes in a population to be screened is approximately 1.5% and it is assumed that 10,000 persons will be screened. The screening test will measure blood serum sugar content. A value of 180 mg/dl or higher is considered positive. The sensitivity (a) and the specificity (d) associated with this screening are 22.9% and 99.8% respectively. Questions 1-9: set up a two by two table with the...

  • pls answer all 5:12 .. LED < Back 465 practice 2-1.docx 17 imagine you are a...

    pls answer all 5:12 .. LED < Back 465 practice 2-1.docx 17 imagine you are a physician discussing the results of a screening test with a patient. 1) If the test was positive how likely is it that he really has the disease? (How worried should he be? 2) If the test was negative how likely is it that he really does NOT have it? How reassured should he be? 1) What does 1) represent? a) Express this measure mathematically...

  • Can someone help me with this please I got it wrong 6. (7 points) A probability...

    Can someone help me with this please I got it wrong 6. (7 points) A probability of subject in an experiment is given three tries to compiis ay s/he she completes the task? irn succese chance of sueeomplete a tadk. On the first try the on the second attermpt is 0.65. If probobty os Su cce esson the third try is 0.7. What is the probability that 7. (15 points; 5, 5. 5) Consider a population in which there arc...

  • According to the information given about interpreting urinalysis can someone please diagnose the patient in the...

    According to the information given about interpreting urinalysis can someone please diagnose the patient in the table according to their data and explain why??? Thanks in advance! Date: Technician: Patient Name: Reveille H. Baloo 17 Gender: Female Age: Routine Urinalysis Physiochemical Other Specific gravity 1.015 - 1.025 Bacteria (present/absent) Negative грн 4 -4.5 Color Yellow Protein 500 mg/dL Pregnancy status Negative Erythrocytes Negative Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) 60mg/100ml Leukocytes (from patient data) Negative Glucose Normal/absent Mean blood pressure (MAP) 73.33...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT