A drywall subcontractor named Jack Munster performed work for Ace Contractors, a general contractor. The value of the work was $1,500. When he did not receive payment, Munster sent a letter threatening a lawsuit if prompt payment was not made. Soon thereafter, Ace Contractors sent a load of drywall to Munster’s business address. This material, which was labeled as being in fulfillment of the debt, was accepted without protest. Six months later Munster sued Ace for $600, the balance that he had determined remained on the debt. Discuss the strength of Munster’s case from the standpoint of consideration.
We need at least 10 more requests to produce the solution.
0 / 10 have requested this problem solution
The more requests, the faster the answer.