Problem

Challenge Problem: Zwanziger and Sarbu27 conducted a study to validate analytical methods...

Challenge Problem: Zwanziger and Sarbu27 conducted a study to validate analytical methods and instruments. The following data are results obtained in the determination of mercury in solid wastes by atomic absorption spectroscopy using two different sample preparation methods: a microwave digestion method and a traditional digestion method.

x, Mercury Concentration, ppm (Traditional)

y, Mercury Concentration, ppm (Microwave)

7.32

5.48

15.8

13.00

4.6

3.29

9.04

6.84

7.16

6.00

6.8

5.84

9.9

14.30

28.7

18.80

(a) Perform a least-squares analysis on the data in the table assuming that the traditional method (x) is the independent variable. Determine the slope, the intercept, the R2 value, the standard error, and any other relevant statistics.

(b) Plot the results obtained in part (a), and give the equation of the regression line.

(c) Now assume that the microwave digestion method (y) is the independent variable, once again perform a regression analysis, and determine the relevant statistics.

(d) Plot the data in part (c), and determine the regression equation.

(e) Compare the regression equation obtained in (b) with the equation from (d). Why are the equations different?

(f) Is there any conflict between the procedure that you have just performed and the assumptions of the least-squares method? What type of statistical analysis would be more appropriate than linear least-squares in dealing with data sets of this type?

(g) Look up the paper in Footnote 27, and compare your results to those presented for Example 4 in Table 2. You will note that your results from (d) differ from the authors' results. What is the most probable explanation for this discrepancy?

(h) Download the test data found in Table 1 of Footnote 27 from Chapter 8 in www.cengage.com/chemistry/skoog/fac9, and perform the same type of analysis for Example 1 and Example 3. Compare your results to those in Table 2 of the paper. Note that in Example 3, you must include all 37 data pairs.

(i) What other methods for dealing with method comparison data are suggested in the paper?

(j) What is implied when we compare two methods by linear regression and the slope is not equal to one? What is implied when the intercept is not zero?

Step-by-Step Solution

Request Professional Solution

Request Solution!

We need at least 10 more requests to produce the solution.

0 / 10 have requested this problem solution

The more requests, the faster the answer.

Request! (Login Required)


All students who have requested the solution will be notified once they are available.
Add your Solution
Textbook Solutions and Answers Search