Part II: Merry-Go-Round. Additional charges made against E&Y included the following (recall that MGR hired E&Y for turnaround consulting services):
• E&Y had a close relationship with Rouse Co., one of MGR’s primary landlords (E&Y was soliciting business from Rouse and provided significant tax services).
• Swidler (the law firm that recommended E&Y to MGR) and E&Y had participated in at least 12 different business arrangements, some of which resulted in Swidler receiving significant fees from E&Y.
• E&Y did not disclose either of these relationships to MGR.
Required:
a. Do you think that E&Y acted unethically, given that it had these relationships?
b. How could these relationships have affected E&Y’s advice to MGR? In other words, refer to the charges above and speculate as to whether any of the charges against E&Y may have stemmed from the relationships described above.
To assist you in answering this question, consider the articles about MGR in footnote 10.
We need at least 10 more requests to produce the solution.
0 / 10 have requested this problem solution
The more requests, the faster the answer.