Problem

The accompanying data on y = energy output (W) and x = temperature difference (°K) was...

The accompanying data on y = energy output (W) and x = temperature difference (°K) was provided by the authors of the article “Comparison of Energy and Exergy Efficiency for Solar Box and Parabolic Cookers” (J. of Energy Engr., 2007: 53–62). The article’s authors fit a cubic regression model to the data. Here is Minitab output from such a fit.

a. What proportion of observed variation in energy outputcan be attributed to the model relationship?

b. Fitting a quadratic model to the data results in R2 = .780. Calculate adjusted R2 for this model and compare to adjusted R2 for the cubic model.

c. Does the cubic predictor appear to provide useful information about y over and above that provided by the linear and quadratic predictors? State and test the appropriate hypotheses.

d. When . Obtain a 95% CI for true average energy output in this case, and also a 95% PI for a single energy output to be observed when temperature difference is 30. Hint: = . 0611.

e. Interpret the hypotheses versus , and then carry out a test at significance level .05 using the fact that when

Step-by-Step Solution

Request Professional Solution

Request Solution!

We need at least 10 more requests to produce the solution.

0 / 10 have requested this problem solution

The more requests, the faster the answer.

Request! (Login Required)


All students who have requested the solution will be notified once they are available.
Add your Solution
Textbook Solutions and Answers Search