Answer 1: compare and contrast
RNA polymerase in bacteria |
RNA polymerase in eukaryotes |
In bacteria RNA polymerase is required for the process of transcription. |
In eukaryotes also RNA polymerase is required for the process of transcription |
In bacteria only one type of RNA polymerase is present for all types of RNA synthesis |
In eukaryotes three distinct types of RNA polymerases are found RNA pol I for rRNA synthesis RNA pol II for mRNA synthesis RNA pol III for tRNA synthesis |
The RNA polymerase in bacteria has 4 catalytic subunits and a regulator sigma factor. The RNA polymerase is large and complex molecule with 490,000da molecular weight. It has two alpha subunits of 40,000da, one β of 155,000da, one β’ of 165,000da and one sigma of 90,000da. Sigma is loosely bound. The rest of the enzyme without sigma factor is the core polymerase. The sigma factor helps in identification of different promoters for expression of different genes. |
The RNA polymerases of eukaryotes, each of them has 8 to 14 subunits. Though they recognise different promoters and synthesise different molecules all three of them have certain similarities. The two largest subunits are related to β and β’ subunits of bacteria. In addition to this five subunits are common to all the three RNA polymerases. |
In bacteria the process of transcription and translation takes place in the cytoplasm, more often simultaneously |
In eukaryotes the process of transcription takes place in the nucleus hence all the polymerases are located in the nucleus.RNA pol I is found in nucleolus and rest of the two are found in nucleoplasm. For the process of translation the eukaryotic mRNA is transported to the cytoplasm. |
In bacteria, binding of sigma factor to the promoter sequence initiates the process of transcription by the RNA polymerase. |
In eukaryotes several transcription factors are required to recognise the promoter sequence by RNA polymerases to start the process of transcription. |
Answer 2: Transcription is formation of mRNA on DNA template. The termination of transcription occurs in 2 ways, firstly by rho dependent factor and secondly by formation of stem loop structure.
Factor dependent termination involves a protein such as rho, that moves along the mRNA behind RNA polymerase and causes the RNA polymerase to dissociate from the DNA when it catches up to the open complex, where as factor independent termination involves formation of G-C rich stem loop structure that prevents the polymerase from continuing along the DNA.
Rho dependent termination:
Rho factor is required for factor-dependent transcription termination by RNA polymerase. Rho factor is hexametric protein. The transcription termination mechanism of Rho factor follows the below mentioned sequence.
Step 1: Rho factor binds to naked RNA at a C- rich site called as Rho utilization site also known as rut site using its primary binding region.
Step 2 The bound RNA reaches to secondary binding site and sensitizes Rho for ATP hydrolysis.
Step 3: The energy obtained from the ATP hydrolysis leads to activation of translocase activity of Rho factor and subsequently leads to unwinding of RNA/DNA duplex.
Rho independent termination
In factor independent termination rho factor is not utilised, instead the enzyme catalysing the transcription i.e. RNA polymerase encounters a palindromic sequence on the DNA which is rich in G-C content, the RNA transcript formed on this part is self complementary and hence it forms a stem loop structure. The high G-C content favours the formation of stem and loop structure. This stem loop structure is followed by a sequence of 4 or more Uracil residues, which are critical for termination. The RNA transcript ends within or just after them
2) Compare and contrast the RNA polymerases of bacteria and eukaryotes te 3) Discuss rho- independent...
Compare and contrast Rho-dependent and Rho- independent termination. What features do they have in common and in what ways do they differ?
Please help compare and contrast the page attached, thanks! Assignment: Bacteria versus Eukaryotes In the space below, compare and contrast the processes of DNA replication, transcription and translation in bacteria and eukaryotes. DNA replication: Bacteria Vs. Eukaryotes Transcription: Bacteria Vs. Eukaryotes Translation: Bacteria Vs. Eukaryotes
Place the labels in the correct column. Eukaryotes Prokaryotes Torpedo and allosteric models Promoter Five general factors Common in mRNA genes Splicing -10 TATA Sigma factor needed Tailing Promotes degradation Capping Does not occur Rho independent and dependent Initiation 3 polymerases Rare;self-splicing Termination One Common on mRNA RNA polymerase Common for stability -25 TATA for mRNA Reset
1. Compare and contrast Prokaryotes and Eukaryotes. 2. How can prokaryotic cells be smaller than eukaryotic cells and still carry on all the essential functions of life. 3. Compare and contrast Archea and Bacteria.
1. The virus hijacks the cell, and RNA polymerases produce the complement to the positive stranded RNA genome. We can call these strands negative strands, and they then serve as templates for RNA polymerases to produce their complement. How does the sequence of these strands, the complement to the negative strands, compare with the original viral genome? 2-1. RNA polymerases lack proofreading ability. Define proofreading ability and describe its importance in replication of DNA genomes. a. Why is this a...
Compare and contrast general structure of bacteria, fungi and viruses. Indicate both hazardous and beneficial impact they have on human life with giving one specific example for each. 1. Fungi 2. Bacteria 3. Viruses - This is microbiology
1. Discuss the evolution of the hospital as a social institution. 2. Compare and contrast the hospital patient sick role to Talcott Parson's sick role.
Define economic growth? Discuss how economic growth is measure? Compare and contrast 2 countries and their economic growth over the last 50 years?
Discussion Questions 1. Compare and contrast planned and emergent approach. 2. Discuss how HRM is related to each of these approaches.
Mo St, Helens oJr 2. (2.5 pts) Compare and contrast the 3 Vs, volcanic materials, and eruptive style of the following eruptions: 1790 Kilauea, 1943 Michoaca, 1991 Pinatubo, 1982 El Chichon, 1815 Tambora, and 1883 Krakatau.