Question

Fraud Case 17-1 Jerry never imagined he'd be sitting there in Washington being grilled mercilessly by! a panel of congressmen. But a young government auditor picked up on his scheme last year. His company produced high-tech navigation devices that were sold to both military and civilian clients. The military contracts were "cost-plus," meaning that payments were calculated based on actual production costs plus a profit markup. The civilian contracts were bid out in a very competitive market, and every dollar counted. Jerry knew that because all the jobs were done in the same factory, he could manipulate the allocation of overhead costs in a way that would shift costs away from

can i please get help?

Answer 1

Answer:

1)

Based looking into the issue perusing or case reading, it reflects that Jerry's organization was using the direct labor cost driver for the allotment of over head to the numerous occupations. Since the Jerry's organization was demonstrating utilization of more hours spent on military employments, in this way showing higher amount of overhead to be dispensed to these occupations over regular civilian contracts .

2)

Jerry's organization is cheating the administration or government since it moving expenses from different contracts to the administration contracts; subsequently damaging the agreement in contract. Subsequently the Jerry's activities will be viewed as fake.

3)

The lower expenses can convert into huge net revenues for Jerry's organization. Moreover, as organization has lower costs in this manner can place bids lower contrasted with their opponents along these lines improving chances of being granted contracts.