Question

How would you differentiate a credible health website from one that is not? (Cite your source)

Answer 1

Since anybody can distribute data on the Internet, it is essential to precisely examine online sources previously you utilize them for scholastic purposes. There is a considerable measure of mistaken, one-sided, and obsolete data on the web. Non-credible sites may have a poor plan, broken connections, and sentence structure and spelling mistakes. They may lack authors, date as well as source data. They won't be related with dependable foundations, associations, or elements. They may contain unimaginable or off base data. The site pages may likewise contain promotions. Be that as it may, some non-credible sites may seem solid, so it is imperative to assess the validity of sites painstakingly.

Credibility Questions:

1. Is authors data accessible? Does the writer have accreditations identified with what he/she is expounding on? Is the suthar related with an association or foundation? Is there a connection to the association/establishment? What is the author's motivation?

2. Is the date of production accessible? Is it later? Are there broken connections or old news on the page?

3. Does the site list its sources? Are the sources solid?

4. What is the domain? (.com, .organization, .net, .edu, .gov) Are there promotions on the site?

5. Is the site planned well?

6. Is the site elegantly composed? Does it have language structure and spelling botches?

7. Utilizing your presence of mind, does the data appear to be one-sided or erroneous? What is the reason for the site?