a)
i)
Given,
Value of low productivity soil = $50000
Chance of low productivity soil = 80%
Value of high productivity soil = $200000
Chance of high productivity soil = 20%
Hence, the value of soil = 0.8* 50000 + 0.2*200000 = 80000
Thus, the seller should sell the soil at $80000
ii)
Now,
the return of seller in low productivity soil condition = (80000 - 50000) / 50000 = 60%
the return of seller in high productivity soil condition = (80000 - 200000) / 200000 = -60%
Hence expected return for seller = 0.8*60% + 0.2*(-60%) = 36%
similarly for buyer
return in low productivity = (50000-80000) / 80000 = -37.5%
return in high productivity = (200000 - 80000) / 80000 = 150%
Thus,
expected return = 0.8*(-37.5%) + 0.2* (150%) =0%
iii)
The court should not enforce a contract after it is found that the soil is of high productivity.
b)
Since selller doesn't have any such device which can help it in finding what type of soil is there. Thus, he should sell at $80000 only.
For the r, he should purchase the soil at $80000 if he found it is of low productivity. so he will incur a loss of only $25000 as he won't purchase a low productivity soil. whereas, in earlier case his profit loss was -$30000
TSR Silding! 5. Consider a farmer who must sale an extensive pasture of 100 acres (the...
ISK Shaing 5. Consider a farmer who must sale an extensive pasture of 100 acres (the "Owner"). The pasture is currently covered by cedars and it is impossible to be sure of the productivity. The soil of the pasture is likely poor quality and can only support 10 cows, making it worth $50,000. But there is a 20 percent chance that it is high quality, meaning it can support 40 cows with a value of $200,000 a. After the pasture...