Question
all question of 10
Bood Refunding Charles River Associates is considering whether to call either of the two perpetual bond issues the company cu
503 The corporate tax rate is 35 percent. What is the NPV of the refunding for each bond? Which, if either, bond should the c
0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Bond A

NPV = PV of gain – PV of cost

PV of gain = value of the bond x(coupon rate – ytm)/ ytm

                     = 125,000,000x (0.07-0.0625)/ 0.0625

                     = 15,000,000

Assume there is tax benefit on call premium:

PV of cost = value of the bond x call premium x(1- tax rate) +cost of refunding x (1- tax rate)

                     = 125,000,000x 0.075 x( 1-0.35) + 11,500,000x(1-0.35)

                     = 6,093,750 + 7,475,000

                     = 13,568,750

Npv = 15,000,000 - 13,568,750

                = $1,431,250

Bond B

NPV = PV of gain – PV of cost

PV of gain = value of the bond x(coupon rate – ytm)/ ytm

                     = 132,000,000x(0.08-0.0710)/ 0.0710

                     = 16,732,394

Assume there is tax benefit on call premium:

PV of cost = value of the bond x call premium x(1- tax rate) +cost of refunding x (1- tax rate)

                     = 132,000,000x 0.08 x( 1-0.35) + 13,000,000x(1-0.35)

                     = 6,864,000 +8,450,000

                     = 15,314,000

Npv = 16,732,394 -15,314,000

                = $1,418,394

Bond A should be chosen since its NPV is higher.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
all question of 10 Bood Refunding Charles River Associates is considering whether to call either of...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • the last option is "Neither bond" I Charles River Associates is considering whether to call either...

    the last option is "Neither bond" I Charles River Associates is considering whether to call either of the two perpetual bond s the company currently has outstanding. If the bond is called, it will be refunded. that is a new bond issue will be made with a lower coupon rate. The proceeds from the new bond issue will be used to repurchase one of the existing bond issues. The information about the two currently outstanding bond issues is: Bond A...

  • The Bowman Corporation has a $20 million bond obligation outstanding, which it is considering refunding. Though...

    The Bowman Corporation has a $20 million bond obligation outstanding, which it is considering refunding. Though the bonds were initially issued at 12 percent, the interest rates on similar issues have declined to 10.5 percent. The bonds were originally issued for 20 years and have 15 years remaining. The new issue would be for 15 years. There is an 8 percent call premium on the old issue. The underwriting cost on the new $20 million issue is $570,000, and the...

  • 11. Refunding analysis Aa Aa Consider yourself the CFO of ToughNut Corp. Management is considering whether...

    11. Refunding analysis Aa Aa Consider yourself the CFO of ToughNut Corp. Management is considering whether the company should refund its $600,000, 12.50% coupon, 10-year bond issue that was sold at par 3 years ago. The flotation cost on this issue was $3,000 that has been amortizing on a straight-line basis over the 10-year original life of the issue. ToughNut Corp has a tax rate of 30%, and current short-term rates are 6% You have collected the following data about...

  • New York Waste (NYW) is considering refunding a $50,000,000, annual payment, 10% coupon, 30-year bond issue...

    New York Waste (NYW) is considering refunding a $50,000,000, annual payment, 10% coupon, 30-year bond issue that was issued 5 years ago. It has been amortizing $3 million of flotation costs on these bonds over their 30-year life. The company could sell a new issue of 25-year bonds at an annual interest rate of 6% in today's market. A call premium of 10% would be required to retire the old bonds, and flotation costs on the new issue would amount...

  • Refunding Analysis Mullet Technologies is considering whether or not to refund a $75 million, 12% coupon,...

    Refunding Analysis Mullet Technologies is considering whether or not to refund a $75 million, 12% coupon, 30-year bond issue that was sold 5 years ago. It is amortizing $6 million of flotation costs on the 12% bonds over the issue's 30-year life. Mullet's investment banks have indicated that the company could sell a new 25-year issue at an interest rate of 11% in today's market. Neither they nor Mullet's management anticipate that interest rates will fall below 11% any time...

  • Refunding Analysis Mullet Technologies is considering whether or not to refund a $50 million, 15% coupon,...

    Refunding Analysis Mullet Technologies is considering whether or not to refund a $50 million, 15% coupon, 30-year bond issue that was sold 5 years ago. It is amortizing $3 million of flotation costs on the 15% bonds over the issue's 30-year life. Mullet's investment banks have indicated that the company could sell a new 25-year issue at an interest rate of 9% in today's market. Neither they nor Mullet's management anticipate that interest rates will fall below 9% any time...

  • Refunding Analysis Mullet Technologies is considering whether or not to refund a $50 million, 15% coupon,...

    Refunding Analysis Mullet Technologies is considering whether or not to refund a $50 million, 15% coupon, 30-year bond issue that was sold 5 years ago. It is amortizing $9 million of flotation costs on the 15% bonds over the issue's 30-year life. Mullet's investment banks have indicated that the company could sell a new 25-year issue at an interest rate of 10% in today's market. Neither they nor Mullet's management anticipate that interest rates will fall below 10% any time...

  • Refunding Analysis Mullet Technologies is considering whether or not to refund a $100 million, 14% coupon,...

    Refunding Analysis Mullet Technologies is considering whether or not to refund a $100 million, 14% coupon, 30-year bond issue that was sold 5 years ago. It is amortizing $3 million of flotation costs on the 14% bonds over the issue's 30-year life. Mullet's investment banks have indicated that the company could sell a new 25-year issue at an interest rate of 9% in today's market. Neither they nor Mullet's management anticipate that interest rates will fall below 9% any time...

  • Problem 18-07 Refunding Analysis Mullet Technologies is considering whether or not to refund a $175 million,...

    Problem 18-07 Refunding Analysis Mullet Technologies is considering whether or not to refund a $175 million, 15% coupon, 30-year bond issue that was sold 5 years ago. It is amortizing $3 million of flotation costs on the 15% bonds over the issue's 30-year life. Mullet's investment banks have indicated that the company could sell a new 25-year issue at an interest rate of 10% in today's market. Neither they nor Mullet's management anticipate that interest rates will fall below 10%...

  • Problem 18-07 Refunding Analysis Mullet Technologies is considering whether or not to refund a $150 million,...

    Problem 18-07 Refunding Analysis Mullet Technologies is considering whether or not to refund a $150 million, 13% coupon, 30-year bond issue that was sold 5 years ago. It is amortizing $3 million of flotation costs on the 13% bonds over the issue's 30-year life. Mullet's investment banks have indicated that the company could sell a new 25-year issue at an interest rate of 10% in today's market. Neither they nor Mullet's management anticipate that interest rates will fall below 10%...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT