Question

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) a.Discuss the facts of the case. (Who are the...

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)

a.Discuss the facts of the case. (Who are the parties? What happened?)

a.Was the decision unanimous? If not, who dissented and why did they dissent? (find and read the dissenting opinion)

b.Why is this case important for health care administrators? (may be separate or combined with i. for your conclusion)

c.What do you think about the decision? (may be separate or combined with h. for your conclusion)

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973)

a.Discuss the facts of the case. (Who are the parties? What happened?)

Plantiff: The case was filed by Norma McCorvey in 1971, known as Jane ROE in court documents.

McCorvey, who lived in Texas and was looking to terminate an unwanted pregnancy not on the grounds of health risks. But the Texas laws prohibited her from the same as it was a crime other than situations of life threatening risks for woman. Similar laws were in place in almost all state at the time.

Defendant : Henry WADE, the district attorney of Dallas County from 1951 to 1987. The defendant enforced the prohibition of abortion under Texas law, except to save a woman's life.

The Constitutional Question aroused in the case was about the Constitutional right of a woman to obtain an abortion at her convenience.

The court ruling allowed for legal abortions during the entire pregnancy. Provided, there are set up conditions to support states to regulate abortion in the second and third trimesters.

The Court decision states that a woman's right to an abortion must be considered l within the right to privacy and protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The supreme court decision affected the laws in 46 states regarding abortion.

Infact, McCorvey never had an abortion as the court proceedings took 3 years to reach the supreme court and for the final decisions. She had delivered a baby girl and given her for adoption.

In later life she became the part of an anti-abortion movement and tried to make the court to reconsider the earlier decision, But was unsuccessful.

a.Was the decision unanimous? If not, who dissented and why did they dissent? (find and read the dissenting opinion)

The decision was issues by the court in January 1973 by a majority vote of 7-2. The majority of the court panel voted to strike down the Texas law. Two member Justices Byron White and William Rehnquist dissented the decision.

The dissented people were in total disagreement with the decision.

White even stated that, he find nothing to support the Court's judgment in the language or history of the Constitution.

b. Why is this case important for health care administrators? (may be separate or combined with i. for your conclusion)

Healthcare administrators may face the situations to take decisions on allowing abortions and must know about the state laws on it. It gives them protection against liability suits and allows them to mould the patient’s for informed decision making.

c.What do you think about the decision? (may be separate or combined with h. for your conclusion)

The case of abortion on grounds of medical emergencies for both mother and child or accidents like rape must be allowed to ensure quality of life. Avoidance of unwanted pregnancies should be advocated that abortions.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973) a.Discuss the facts of the case. (Who are the...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Shift End Poon Enter Del LANDMARK COURT CASE Case Legalizes Abortion In 1970, a single woman...

    Shift End Poon Enter Del LANDMARK COURT CASE Case Legalizes Abortion In 1970, a single woman in Texas became pregnant. The ruling came too late for Jane Roe to have the She had difficulty finding work because of her preg. abortion she originally sought, of course, but it nancy and feared the stigma of an illegitimate birth. affected the rights of all women who would seek Under the fictitious name "Jane Roe," the woman sued abortions from that time on....

  • U.S. v. Lopez (1995) facts of the case law: Commerce Clause Gun Free School Zone Act...

    U.S. v. Lopez (1995) facts of the case law: Commerce Clause Gun Free School Zone Act of 1990 Question: Does the Gun Free School Zone Act of 1990, which forbids individuals from knowingly carrying a gun into a school zone, exceed Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause? Yes 5 to 4 decision Opinion of the Court (Rehnquist) The government defends the Act with three arguments: Violent crime is costly by way of increasing insurance. Violent crime reduces commercial activity, because...

  • Please Brief: "Brown vs. Board of Education ". located on Page 5 of your book. 1....

    Please Brief: "Brown vs. Board of Education ". located on Page 5 of your book. 1. Make sure to click on the link below to assist in understanding how to properly "brief" as case. 2. Then read the case on Page 5, and brief the case using the "IRAC" format. When you are finished briefing the case, click on the title above and uploaded it into the *** Make sure to begin your brief with a brief facts section telling...

  • Case 10.2 Laurie Chadwick v. WellPoint, Inc. 561 F.3d 38; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 6426 (U.S....

    Case 10.2 Laurie Chadwick v. WellPoint, Inc. 561 F.3d 38; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 6426 (U.S. Court of Appeals First Circuit) The issue is whether Laurie Chadwick was overlooked for the promotion because she had small children. STAHL, CIRCUIT JUDGE. Laurie Chadwick brought a claim of sex discrimination under Title VII against WellPoint, Inc. after she was denied a promotion. She alleged that her employer failed to promote her because of a sex-based stereotype that women who are mothers, particularly...

  • TRUE/FALSE ___1. A reference to “RCW 4.12.020" means that a statute can be found on page...

    TRUE/FALSE ___1. A reference to “RCW 4.12.020" means that a statute can be found on page 12 of volume 4 of the Revised Code of Washington, part 20. ___2. The United States Congress has adopted one particular approach to ethics, and made it a part of the United States Code; all United States businesses must follow only those statutes in the United States Code, and are not allowed to determine what their businesses’ approaches to ethics will be. ___3. An...

  • Review the following court case: Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. 419 U.S. 345(1974) 1. What are...

    Review the following court case: Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co. 419 U.S. 345(1974) 1. What are the facts of this case? What is the issue? 2. In what court was it decided, and how did it get to that court? 3. What did the court below decide, and why? What did this court decide, and why? 4. What does it mean to be "affected with the public interest"? 5. What is the significance of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S....

  • Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion   ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been...

    Case review for Alaska Packers Assoc. v Domenico (9th Circuit, 1902) Issue, Ruling, Application, Conclusion   ROSS, Circuit Judge. The libel in this case was based upon a contract alleged to have been entered into between the libelants and the appellant corporation on the 22d day of May, 1900, at Pyramid Harbor, Alaska, by which it is claimed the appellant promised to pay each of the libelants, among other things, the sum of $100 for services rendered and to be rendered....

  • Local 28, Sheet Metal Workers v. EEOC 478 U.S. 421 (1986) The union and its apprenticeship...

    Local 28, Sheet Metal Workers v. EEOC 478 U.S. 421 (1986) The union and its apprenticeship committee were found guilty of discrimination against Hispanics and African-Americans and were ordered to remedy the violations. They were found numerous times to be in contempt of the court’s order, and after 18 years the court eventually imposed fines and an affirmative action plan as a remedy. The plan included benefits to persons not members of the union. The Supreme Court held the remedies...

  • CASE 17: WATSON’S AMBULATORY EHR TRANSITION Major theme: System acquisition Primary care physicians play a key...

    CASE 17: WATSON’S AMBULATORY EHR TRANSITION Major theme: System acquisition Primary care physicians play a key role in the U.S. health care delivery system. These providers integrate internal and external information with their clinical knowledge to determine the patient’s treatment options. An effective ambulatory electronic health record (EHR) is critical to supply physicians with the information they need to provide quality care and maximize their efficiency. This case involves the decision-making process to replace an inadequate EHR system in a...

  • you must use the format provided below in order to brief the attached case 221 N.W.2d...

    you must use the format provided below in order to brief the attached case 221 N.W.2d 609 (1974) John SALSBURY, Appellee, v. NORTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, Appellant. No. 55960. Supreme Court of Iowa. September 18, 1974. Laird, Burington, Bovard & Heiny, Mason City, and William F. McFarlin, Des Moines, for appellant. Boyd G. Hayes, Charles City, and William Pappas, Mason City, for appellee. Considered en banc. HARRIS, Justice. This is the third appeal in which we have considered a claim...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT