Question

Instructions: The assignment is based on the mini case below. The instructions relating to the assignment...

Instructions: The assignment is based on the mini case below. The instructions relating to the assignment are at the end of the case.

Liz Jenkins and David Lee are facing an important decision. After having discussed different financial scenarios into the wee hours of the morning, the two computer engineers felt it was time to finalize their cash flow projections and move to the next stage – decide which of two possible projects they should undertake.

Both had a bachelor degree in engineering and had put in several years as maintenance engineers in a large chip manufacturing company. About six months ago, they were able to exercise their first stock options. That was when they decided to quit their safe, steady job and pursue their dreams of starting a venture of their own. In their spare time, almost as a hobby, they had been collaborating on some research into a new chip that could speed up certain specialized tasks by as much as 25%. At this point, the design of the chip was complete. While further experimentation might improve the performance of their design, any delay in entering the market now may prove to be costly, as one of the established players might introduce a similar product of their own. The duo knew that now was the time to act if at all.

They estimated that they would need to spend about $5,600,000 on plant, equipment and supplies. As for future cash flows, they felt that the right strategy at least for the first year would be to sell their product at dirt-cheap prices in order to induce customer acceptance. Then, once the product had established a name for itself, the price could be raised. By the end of the fifth year, their product in its current form was likely to be obsolete. However, the innovative approach that they had devised and patented could be sold to a larger chip manufacturer for a decent sum. Accordingly, the two budding entrepreneurs estimated the cash flows for this project (call it Project A) as follows:

Year

Project A

Expected Cash flows ($)

0

($5,600,000)

1

$622,500

2

$885,000

3

$1,920,000

4

$3,187,500

5

$4,450,000

An alternative to pursuing this project would be to immediately sell the patent for their innovative chip design to one of the established chip makers. They estimated that they would receive around $400,000 for this. It would probably not be reasonable to expect much more as neither their product nor their innovative approach had a track record.

They could then invest in some plant and equipment that would test silicon wafers for zircon content before the wafers were used to make chips. Too much zircon would affect the long-term performance of the chips. The task of checking the level of zircon was currently being performed by chip makers themselves. However, many of them, especially the smaller ones, did not have the capacity to permit 100% checking. Most tested only a sample of the wafers they received.

Liz and David were confident that they could persuade at least some of the chip makers to outsource this function to them. By exclusively specializing in this task, their little company would be able to slash costs by more than half, and thus allow the chip manufacturers to go in for 100% quality check for roughly the same cost as what they were incurring for a partial quality check today. The life of this project too (call it project B) is expected to be only about five years.

The initial investment for this project is estimated at $5,800,000. After taking into account the sale of their patent, the net investment would be $5,400,000. As for the future, Liz and David were reasonably sure that there would be sizable profits in the first couple of years. But thereafter, the zircon content problem would slowly start to disappear with advancing technology in the wafer industry. Keeping all this in mind, they estimate the cash flows for this project as follows:

Year

Project B

Expected Cash flows ($)

0

($5,400,000)

1

$3,292,500

2

$2,737,500

3

$1,057,500

4

$641,250

5

$371,250

Liz and David now need to make their decision. For purposes of analysis, they plan to use a required rate of return of 16% for both projects. Ideally, they would prefer that the project they choose have a payback period of less than 4 years and a discounted payback period of less than 5 years.

Below are the results of the analysis they have carried out so far:

Metrics

Project A

Project B

Payback period (in years)

3.68

1.77

Discounted payback period (in years)

4.67

2.78

Net Present Value (NPV)

$703,531

$681,180

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

19.82%

23.85%

Profitability Index

1.1256

1.1261

Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)

18.78%

18.79%

One of the concerns that Liz and David have is regarding the reliability of their cash flow estimates. All the analysis in the table above is based on “expected” cash flows. However, they are both aware that actual future cash flows may be higher or lower.

Assignment:

Suppose that Liz and David have hired you as a consultant to help them make the decision. Please draft an official memo to them with your analysis and recommendations.

Your submission should cover the following questions:

  1. Briefly, summarize the key facts of the case and identify the problem being faced by our two budding entrepreneurs. In other words, what is the decision that they need to make? (10 points)

An excellent paper will demonstrate the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement while identifying all underlying issues.

  1. What are some approaches that can be used to solve this problem? What are some various criteria or metrics that can be used to help make this decision? (10 points)

An excellent paper will propose solutions that are sensitive to all the identified issues.

  1. a) Rank the projects based on each of the following metrics: Payback period, Discounted payback period, NPV, IRR, Profitability Index, and MIRR. (10 points)

b) David believes that the best approach to make the decision is the NPV approach. However, Liz is not so sure that ignoring the other metrics is a good idea. Which of the approaches or metrics would you propose? In other words, would you prefer one or more of these approaches over the others? Explain why. (20 points)

An excellent paper will include an evaluation of solutions containing thorough and insightful explanations, feasibility of solutions, and impacts of solutions.

  1. a) Which of these projects would you recommend? Explain why. (10 points)

b) Briefly state the limitations of the approach you used in making this decision, and outline what further analysis you would recommend. (20 points)

An excellent paper will provide concise yet thorough action-oriented recommendations using appropriate subject-matter justifications related to the problem while addressing limitations of the solution and outlining recommended future analysis.

0 0
Add a comment Improve this question Transcribed image text
Answer #1

Answer 1:

  1. Liz Jenkins and David Lee are in favour of two different projects which is named as A and B respectively and their key indicators are shown below:

Year

Project A

Expected Cash flows ($)

Project B

Expected Cash flows ($)

0

($5,600,000)

($5,400,000)

1

$622,500

$3,292,500

2

$885,000

$2,737,500

3

$1,920,000

$1,057,500

4

$3,187,500

$641,250

5

$4,450,000

$371,250

Other key parameters of the projects are given below:

Metrics

Project A

Project B

Payback period (in years)

3.68

1.77

Discounted payback period (in years)

4.67

2.78

Net Present Value (NPV)

$703,531

$681,180

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

19.82%

23.85%

Profitability Index

1.1256

1.1261

Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)

18.78%

18.79%

While considering the given factors Project B has lower payback period 1.77 years which shows that it will generate cash to recover the initial investment made. It purely emphasizes on the cash inflows and economic life of the project and the investment made in the project which is almost 52% of higher of Project A. Profitability Index of both projects A and B does not have any significant difference there is only a difference of 0.0005, again it is higher of the Project B.

Answer 2:

There are different approaches which can be used while taking the decision which can be:

  1. On the basis of given Payback Period:

Which project has less payback period and generate more cash flows in order to recover initial investment made in the project.

  1. On the basis of NPV:

Net present value of the investment is also help in taking the decision, considers the time value of money and is consistent with the objective of maximizing profits for the Investments.

  1. On the basis of IRR:

Internal Rate of Return considers time value of money factor in the investments. It tries to arrive to a rate of interest at which funds invested in the project could be repaid out of the cash inflows.

Answer 3 (a):

Below are rank of the projects on the basis of given metrics:

Metrics

Project A

Project B

Payback period (in years)

Rank 2

Rank 1

Discounted payback period (in years)

Rank 2

Rank 1

Net Present Value (NPV)

Rank 1

Rank 2

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

Rank 2

Rank 1

Profitability Index

Rank 2

Rank 1

Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR)

Rank 2

Rank 1

Answer 3 (b):

David approach is not the best if he takes his decision on the basis of NPV metrics. When he has other factors which are really helpful in taking a good decision so he should ignore these metrics. If you would ask my view, I generally go for all the key metrics given here which really helpful. Here in these given projects I would like take the decision on the below parameters:

  1. Payback Period which project has least payback period
  2. Discounted payback period which project has least.
  3. Internal rate of return which projects has higher IRR
  4. NPV is also key factor I would also not ignore it but here in these NPV has difference of approx. 3% between A and B, whereas other factors shows the major factoring.

Answer 4 (a):

I would surly recommend for Project B on the basis of given metrics since in Project A only one metrics which is good in comparison with Project B is NPV (net present value), that also does not have very major difference this is only 3.18% higher than of Project B. Other given metrics such as Payback Period, Discounted payback period, IRR and profitability index are completely in favour of Project B.

Answer 4 (b):

While taking the decision of the given projects limitation was the given metrics and I am not sure what method is used while calculating these metrics, by applying different method we can also get a close watch on the given factors at different stage of the projects.

Capital budgeting is a vital part of all the projects, whether big or small. With a single fault in capital budgeting, the company may end up into huge loss and vice-versa. Given metrics are key indicators of any capital budgeting decision and apart from there would be which can affect the project is source of funding, performance review of the project and real cash flow from the project.

Add a comment
Know the answer?
Add Answer to:
Instructions: The assignment is based on the mini case below. The instructions relating to the assignment...
Your Answer:

Post as a guest

Your Name:

What's your source?

Earn Coins

Coins can be redeemed for fabulous gifts.

Not the answer you're looking for? Ask your own homework help question. Our experts will answer your question WITHIN MINUTES for Free.
Similar Homework Help Questions
  • Instructions: The assignment is based on the mini case below. The instructions relating to the assignment...

    Instructions: The assignment is based on the mini case below. The instructions relating to the assignment are at the end of the case. Maya Lee and John Spencer are facing an important decision. After having discussed different financial scenarios into the wee hours of the morning, the two computer engineers felt it was time to finalize their cash flow projections and move to the next stage – decide which of two possible projects they should undertake. Both had a bachelor...

  • Liz Jenkins and David Lee are facing an important decision. After having discussed different financial scenarios...

    Liz Jenkins and David Lee are facing an important decision. After having discussed different financial scenarios into the wee hours of the morning, the two computer engineers felt it was time to finalize their cash flow projections and move to the next stage – decide which of two possible projects they should undertake. Both had a bachelor degree in engineering and had put in several years as maintenance engineers in a large chip manufacturing company. About six months ago, they...

  • Alice Werd is a new project analyst; he is working on capital budgeting analysis of two...

    Alice Werd is a new project analyst; he is working on capital budgeting analysis of two mutually exclusive projects. The followings are the cash flow forecasts for both the projects years Project A Expected Cash flows Project B Expected Cash flows 0 (1000,000) ($900,000) 1 50000 650,000 2 200,000 650,000 3 600,000 550,000 4 1000,000 300,000 5 1500,000 100,000 The following metrics presents the key information based on capital budgeting indicators. For purposes of analysis, he plans to use a...

  • Mini Case This Mini Case is available in MyFinanceLab. Your first assignment in your new position as assistant financi...

    Mini Case This Mini Case is available in MyFinanceLab. Your first assignment in your new position as assistant financial analyst at Caledonia Products is to evaluate two new capital-budgeting proposals. Because this is your first assignment, you have been asked not only to provide a recommendation but also to respond to a number of questions aimed at assessing your understanding of the capital-budgeting process. This is a standard procedure for all new financial analysts at Caledonia, and it will serve...

  • thorough and no excel solutions please:) need answers for parts a-c A firm is considering the...

    thorough and no excel solutions please:) need answers for parts a-c A firm is considering the following projects. Its opportunity cost of capital is 10%. Cash Flows, $ Project Time: 2 +1,825 +4,300 +1,825 3 +4,650 +3,650 -8,300 -4,300 -8,300 +1,825 В +4,650 +8,300 +1,825 +4,650 a. What is the payback period on each project? Project A | years Project B years Project C years What is the discounted payback period on each project? (Round your answers to 2 decimal...

  • Abstract This case deals with the capital budgeting techniques of Net Present Value (i.e. NPV) and...

    Abstract This case deals with the capital budgeting techniques of Net Present Value (i.e. NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (i.e. IRR). In this case, students will compare two mutually exclusive projects using NPV and IRR, and choose the best project. They will learn about NPV and IRR methods and their advantages and disadvantages. Students will also learn the weakness of the IRR method when comparing two or more projects. Finally, they will evaluate the two projects assuming that the...

  • Construction is analyzing its capital expenditure proposals for the purchase of equipment in the coming year....

    Construction is analyzing its capital expenditure proposals for the purchase of equipment in the coming year. The capital budget is limited to $5,000,000 for the year Lemon Baker​, staff analyst at Hafners​ is preparing an analysis of the three projects under consideration by Corey Hafners​, the​ company's owner. Projected cash outflow   Project A Project B Project C Net initial investment $3,000,000 $2,100,000 $3,000,000 Projected cash inflows Year 1 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 $1,700,000 Year 2 1,200,000 600,000 1,700,000 Year 3 1,200,000 500,000...

  • Suppose your firm is considering investing in a project with the cash flows shown below, that...

    Suppose your firm is considering investing in a project with the cash flows shown below, that the required rate of return on projects of this risk class is 8 percent, and the maximum allowable payback for the project is 3.5 years Time Cash Flow 0 -5000 1 1200 2 2400 3 1600 4 1600 5 1400 6 1200 Evaluate this decision based on each of the following criteria: Payback IRR NPV In your write up, would you approve of this...

  • Q1. Inatech is contemplating two different projects and decides to perform a financial analysis to determine...

    Q1. Inatech is contemplating two different projects and decides to perform a financial analysis to determine which is more financially lucrative. Project A and B have the cash flows as shown and Inatech uses a required rate of return of 10% and an inflation rate of 4%. Compute the payback in years and the net present value for both projects and offer advice as to the best course of action. (4 marks) Yearl A B 0 -$100.000|-$400,000 $20,000 $75,000 2....

  • This assignment supports the following objectives: Calculate IRR, NPV and Payback Period Analyze the cash flows...

    This assignment supports the following objectives: Calculate IRR, NPV and Payback Period Analyze the cash flows generated by mutually exclusive projects Formulate a recommendation using IRR, NPV and Payback Period as the criteria Background Suppose that your firm is considering the following two mutually exclusive projects. Both projects have the same initial cost of $312,500 and the resulting annual cash flows for the first five years are as shown in the table below: Year Alpha Beta 0 $ (312,500) $...

ADVERTISEMENT
Free Homework Help App
Download From Google Play
Scan Your Homework
to Get Instant Free Answers
Need Online Homework Help?
Ask a Question
Get Answers For Free
Most questions answered within 3 hours.
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT