Cohort study has a larger sample size, more costs and longer time frame in comparison to case-control studies.
1. Study a rare disease- Case-control studies because subjects are chosen from the population by their outcome status.
2. Study a rare exposure- Cohort studies because subjects are chosen by their exposure status in cohort studies.
3. Study multiple exposures: Case-control studies because case-control study is better for multiple exposures to be assessed for one outcome
4. study multiple outcomes: Cohort study because multiple outcomes can be examined simultaneously.
5. Study progression of the illness: Case-control studies because subjects are chosen from the population by their outcome status.
6. Calculate disease rates: Cohort study because disease rates can be calculated.
7. Recall bias: Less likely chance of its presence in Cohort study
8. Loss to follow-up: Less likely chance of its presence in Case-control study
9. Selection Bias: Less likely chance of its presence in Cohort study
All changes saved in Drive Question 26: Which of the studies (case-control or cohort) has a...
For the first six issues below, cite which study is best to use (case-control or cohort study). For the last 3 types of bias, cite which study is less likely to have that particular type of bias (case-control or cohort) Answer 26 1) Study a rare discase 2) Study a rare exposure 3) Study multiple exposures 4) Study multiple outcomes 5) Study progression of the illness 6) Calculate disease rates 7) Recall bias 8) Loss to follow-up 9) Selection bias...
Part 3:1dentify the following features with appropriate study design: ...Case-control study 1 b. Cohort study Categorize subjects on the basis of exposure and then follow up to see if they develop the health condition we are studying. 1. Generally used to explore rare diseases. Useful for exploring several risk factors for a given outcome. After some time compare the disease rate for the exposed with that of the unexposed. Generally used when the exposure is rare. 1 Useful when there...
Which statements are true, and which are false? Explain. Tor F Recall bias always results in an underestimate of the magnitude of association. Tor F Prospective cohort studies are prone to recall bias. Tor F Interviewer bias can produce either an over-estimate or under-estimate of the magnitude of association. Tor F Significant loss to follow up can cause an over-estimate or under-estimate of the magnitude of association in a prospective cohort study. Tor F Case-control studies are vulnerable to bias...
9. Bias is less likely to invalidate a cohort study used to assess the risk of disease due to an exposure because: A. The presence or absence of exposure is determined prior to disease occurrence B. The sample sizes in cohort studies are large C. Disease status is always known at the start of the study D. Incident cases of the disease are distinguished from prevalent cases in the analyses E. Analyses are based on a comparison of the proportion...
Choose the study design that best matches each statement described below. The study design may be used more than once or none at all. (24 points) Statement Study Design ____ Blinding or masking is used to control potential bias. Case-Control ____ Observational epidemiological studies, this design is cheaper and faster to conduct because of the usage of already existing data. Cross-sectional ____ Control groups can receive the current “standard” treatment or a placebo. Ecological ____ Data on exposure and outcome...
You have conducted a case-control study to determine the association between exposure to lead and development of cognitive disorders. Exposure data were collected from measuring blood samples and outcomes data from medical records. Participants were randomly selected to be included into the study. The investigator who obtained the exposures and outcomes data was blinded to the outcome status of the participant. In your study, you find an OR of 1.01. However, the actual association between exposure to lead and cognitive...
PPH4801/MPHDHM9 MaylJune 2018 SECTCION B: QUESTION 1 1.1 Discuss the strengths and limitations of cohort studies. 12 Compare and contrast the design features of prospective and ret Co 0 (15) cohort studies (10) 1251 QUESTION 2: 21 Explain and discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a cross-sectional study (15) [15] QUESTION 3 3 1 Discuss the strengths and limitations of case-control studies 32 Compare and contrast the utlity of hospital and neighborhood controls 33 Explain/argue why is there potental for...
1. Describe: a) a control subject in a case-control study, 2. and b) a control subject in an experiment. You may want to describe their disease and/or exposure status. 3. Does "validity" indicate that a test or an instrument is accurate/correct? a. Yes b. No 4. The Healthy Worker Effect is an epidemiological concept that has shown that as a group, people who are employed are healthier than the general population. Because of this researchers must be alert to the...
Which population do you start with in cohort study versus which population do you start with in case-control studies? Why do we care about ethics in epidemiology? What makes a study ethical (you may want to look at the Nuremberg code and the Declaration of Helsinki-think about informed consent, compensation, the role of institutional review boards, conflicts of interest, patient safety)? What do we look at to consider causality, after we have considered the role of chance (chapter 7), bias...
The study also provided mortality rates for cardiovascular disease among smokers and non-smokers. The following table presents lung cancer mortality data and comparable cardiovascular disease mortality data. Table 2. Mortality rates (per 1,000 person-years), rate ratios, and excess deaths from lung cancer and cardiovascular disease by smoking status, Doll and Hill physician cohort study, Great Britain, 1951-1961. Mortality rate per 1,000 person-years Smokers Non-smokers All Rate ratio Excess deaths Attributable risk per 1,000 person-years smokers 1.23 2.19 percent among 1.30...