FIFO Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments
Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments.
The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December:
Units to account for: | ||
Units, beginning work in process | 4,000 | (40% complete) |
Units started | ? | |
Total units to account for | ? | |
Units accounted for: | ||
Units, ending work in process | 8,000 | (50% complete) |
Units completed | ? | |
Units accounted for | ? |
Costs in beginning work in process for the Polishing Department were direct materials, $5,000; conversion costs, $6,000; and transferred in, $8,000. Costs added during the month: direct materials, $32,000; conversion costs, $50,000; and transferred in, $40,000.
Assume the company uses the FIFO method.
Required:
1-a. Prepare a schedule of equivalent units. Enter percentages as whole numbers.
Direct Materials | Conversion Costs | Transferred In | |
Units started and completed | |||
Units to complete in BWIP: | blank | ||
x % |
|||
Units in EWIP: | |||
x % |
blank | blank | |
x % |
|||
Total equivalent units |
Feedback
The FIFO method excludes the equivalent output and costs in BWIP when the current-period unit cost is calculated. FIFO follows the process-costing principle. When calculating costs of goods transferred out, two categories of completed units are needed: Units completed from BWIP and Units started and completed.
1-b. Compute the unit cost for the month of
December. Round intermediate calculations and your final answer to
the nearest cent.
$ per equivalent unit
Solution 1a:
Computation of Equivalent unit of Production - Polishing Department | ||||
Particulars | Physical Units | Transferred in cost | Material | Conversion |
Units to account for: | ||||
Beginning WIP | 4000 | |||
Started into Production | 20000 | |||
Total units to account for | 24000 | |||
Units
from beginning WIP: Transferred in - 0% Material - 60% Conversion - 60% |
4000 | 0 | 2400 | 2400 |
Units started and completed | 12000 | 12000 | 12000 | 12000 |
Ending
WIP: Transferred In - 100% Direct materials - 50% Conversion - 50% |
8000 | 8000 | 4000 | 4000 |
Equivalent units of production | 24000 | 20000 | 18400 | 18400 |
Solution 1b:
Computation of Cost per equivalent unit of Production - Polishing Department | |||
Particulars | Transferred in cost | Material | Conversion |
Current periods costs | $40,000.00 | $32,000.00 | $50,000.00 |
Equivalent units of production | 20000 | 18400 | 18400 |
Cost per Equivalent unit | $2.00 | $1.74 | $2.72 |
Unit cost for the month of December = $2 + $1.74 + $2.72 = $6.46 per unit
FIFO Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through...
FIFO Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for: Units,...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for:...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for:...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for:...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple DepartmentsFordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments.The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December:Units to account for: Units, beginning work in...
Problem 2 Watson Company has a polishing. During October.th polishing department. The cost $40.000. Direct materials are upany has a product that passes through two processes: grinding and uring October, the grinding department transferred 20.000 units to the 9 department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was measured the same way in both departments Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process Units are econd department (polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for The...
Weighted Average Method, FIFO Method, Physical Flow, Equivalent Units Heap Company manufactures a product that passes through two processes: Fabrication and Assembly. The following information was obtained for the Fabrication Department for September: All materials are added at the beginning of the process. Beginning work in process had 81,400 units, 30 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Ending work in process had 12,100 units, 25 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Started in process, 110,000 units. Required: 1....
Weighted Average Method, FIFO Method, Physical Flow, Equivalent Units Heap Company manufactures a product that passes through two processes: Fabrication and Assembly. The following information was obtained for the Fabrication Department for September: All materials are added at the beginning of the process. Beginning work in process had 80,000 units, 30 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Ending work in process had 17,000 units, 25 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Started in process, 95,000 units. Required: 1....
Cost Information and FIFO Gunnison Company had the following equivalent units schedule and cost information for its Sewing Department for the month of December: Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units started and completed 49,000 49,000 Add: Units in beginning work in process × Percentage complete: 6,000 × 0% direct materials — 6,000 × 50% conversion Costs 3,000 Add: Units in ending work in process × Percentage complete: 10,000 × 100% direct materials 10,000 — 10,000 × 35% conversion Costs —...
Cost Information and FIFO Gunnison Company had the following equivalent units schedule and cost information for its Sewing Department for the month of December: Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units started and completed 49,000 49,000 Add: Units in beginning work in process × Percentage complete: 6,000 × 0% direct materials — 6,000 × 50% conversion Costs 3,000 Add: Units in ending work in process × Percentage complete: 10,000 × 100% direct materials 10,000 — 10,000 × 35% conversion Costs —...