Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments
Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments.
The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December:
Units to account for: | ||
Units, beginning work in process | 4,000 | (40% complete) |
Units started | ? | |
Total units to account for | ? | |
Units accounted for: | ||
Units, ending work in process | 8,000 | (50% complete) |
Units completed | ? | |
Units accounted for | ? |
Costs in beginning work in process for the Polishing Department were direct materials, $4,000; conversion costs, $7,000; and transferred in, $9,000. Costs added during the month: direct materials, $33,000; conversion costs, $47,000; and transferred in, $39,000.
Required:
1. Assuming the use of the weighted average method, prepare a schedule of equivalent units. Enter percentages as whole numbers.
Direct Materials | Conversion Costs | Transferred In | |
Units completed | |||
Ending WIP: | |||
x % |
|||
x % |
|||
Total equivalent units |
Feedback
To calculate equivalent units, weighted average counts prior-period output in BWIP as belonging to the current period. So all completed units are treated as output of the current period.
2. Compute the unit cost for the month. If
required, round your answer to the nearest cent.
$ per equivalent unit
Solution 1:
Computation of Equivalent unit of Production - Polishing Department | ||||
Particulars | Physical Units | Transferred in cost | Material | Conversion |
Units to account for: | ||||
Beginning WIP | 4000 | |||
Started into Production | 20000 | |||
Total units to account for | 24000 | |||
Unit completed & Transferred out | 16000 | 16000 | 16000 | 16000 |
Closing WIP: | 8000 | |||
Prior deparment cost (100%) | 8000 | |||
Material (50%) | 4000 | |||
Conversion (50%) | 4000 | |||
Equivalent units of production | 24000 | 24000 | 20000 | 20000 |
Solution 2:
Computation of Cost per equivalent unit of Production - Polishing Department | |||
Particulars | Transferred in cost | Material | Conversion |
Opening WIP | $9,000.00 | $4,000.00 | $7,000.00 |
Cost Added during Period | $39,000.00 | $33,000.00 | $47,000.00 |
Total cost to be accounted for | $48,000.00 | $37,000.00 | $54,000.00 |
Equivalent units of production | 24000 | 20000 | 20000 |
Cost per Equivalent unit | $2.00 | $1.85 | $2.70 |
Cost per equivalent unit = $2 + $1.85 + $2.70 = $6.55 per unit
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for:...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for:...
FIFO Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for: Units,...
FIFO Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple Departments Fordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments. The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December: Units to account for: Units,...
Weighted Average Method, Equivalent Units, Unit Cost, Multiple DepartmentsFordman Company has a product that passes through two processes: Grinding and Polishing. During December, the Grinding Department transferred 20,000 units to the Polishing Department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was $40,000. Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process. Units are measured the same way in both departments.The second department (Polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for December:Units to account for: Units, beginning work in...
Problem 2 Watson Company has a polishing. During October.th polishing department. The cost $40.000. Direct materials are upany has a product that passes through two processes: grinding and uring October, the grinding department transferred 20.000 units to the 9 department. The cost of the units transferred into the second department was measured the same way in both departments Direct materials are added uniformly in the second process Units are econd department (polishing) had the following physical flow schedule for The...
Weighted Average Method, FIFO Method, Physical Flow, Equivalent Units Heap Company manufactures a product that passes through two processes: Fabrication and Assembly. The following information was obtained for the Fabrication Department for September: All materials are added at the beginning of the process. Beginning work in process had 80,000 units, 30 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Ending work in process had 17,000 units, 25 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Started in process, 95,000 units. Required: 1....
Weighted Average Method, FIFO Method, Physical Flow, Equivalent Units Heap Company manufactures a product that passes through two processes: Fabrication and Assembly. The following information was obtained for the Fabrication Department for September: All materials are added at the beginning of the process. Beginning work in process had 81,400 units, 30 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Ending work in process had 12,100 units, 25 percent complete with respect to conversion costs. Started in process, 110,000 units. Required: 1....
Cost Information and the Weighted Average Method Morrison Company had the equivalent units schedule and cost information for its Sewing Department for the month of December, as shown below. Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units completed 46,000 46,000 Add: Units in ending work in process × Percentage complete: 10,000 × 100% direct materials 10,000 — 10,000 × 40% conversion materials — 4,000 Eqivalent units of output 56,000 50,000 Costs: Work in process, December 1: Direct materials...
Cost Information and the Weighted Average Method Morrison Company had the equivalent units schedule and cost information for its Sewing Department for the month of December, as shown below. Direct Materials Conversion Costs Units completed 40,000 40,000 Add: Units in ending work in process × Percentage complete: 10,000 × 100% direct materials 10,000 — 10,000 × 40% conversion materials — 4,000 Eqivalent units of output 50,000 44,000 Costs: Work in process, December 1: Direct materials $62,000 Conversion costs 12,000 Total...